H. Res. 1046 (119th)Bill Overview

Rule for H.R. 3310

Congress|Congress
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 9, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution (H.

Res. 1046) sets the terms for floor consideration of H.R. 3310, which would designate Venezuela for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) under INA §244.

The rule waives all points of order, considers the bill as read, limits debate to one hour equally divided, allows one motion to recommit, suspends two specified House rule clauses, and requires the Clerk to notify the Senate of passage within one week.

Passage35/100

Procedural rule aids House passage, but substantive immigration measure faces significant Senate and executive-branch uncertainties.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-specified rules resolution that clearly prescribes how the House will consider H.R. 3310, including waivers, debate parameters, and a post-passage transmission requirement.

Contention70/100

Progressives emphasize humanitarian protection and TPS benefits.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
States · Local governmentsTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • StatesEligible Venezuelan nationals could receive TPS and employment authorization, enabling lawful work in the United States.
  • Targeted stakeholdersTemporary protection would reduce immediate risk of deportation for qualifying Venezuelans.
  • Local governmentsAuthorized workers could contribute payroll and income taxes, modestly increasing federal and local tax revenues.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersWaiving points of order and rules reduces time for legislative scrutiny and amendment.
  • Targeted stakeholdersLimited debate could constrain minority participation and detailed examination of bill provisions.
  • Targeted stakeholdersImplementing TPS requires DHS administrative resources, increasing regulatory and operational workload.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize humanitarian protection and TPS benefits.
Progressive90%

Likely supportive because it advances TPS eligibility for Venezuelan nationals, a humanitarian relief measure.

The closed rule is a downside, but the priority will be on protecting vulnerable migrants facing instability in Venezuela.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautiously favorable overall to providing temporary protection for Venezuelans on humanitarian grounds, but concerned about procedural shortcuts.

Wants cost estimates, clear duration, and implementation oversight before fully endorsing.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed due to expanding TPS eligibility and the rushed, waiver-heavy procedural rule.

Views this as incentivizing irregular migration and bypassing normal legislative scrutiny.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Procedural rule aids House passage, but substantive immigration measure faces significant Senate and executive-branch uncertainties.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Level of bipartisan support for H.R.3310 in both chambers
  • Senate ability to overcome filibuster-like supermajority requirements
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize humanitarian protection and TPS benefits.

Procedural rule aids House passage, but substantive immigration measure faces significant Senate and executive-branch uncertainties.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-specified rules resolution that clearly prescribes how the House will consider H.R. 3310, including waivers, debate parameters, and a post-passa…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis