- Targeted stakeholdersSpeeds enactment of DHS appropriations, reducing the risk of funding lapses or shutdowns.
- Targeted stakeholdersProvides procedural certainty and a clear timeline for House floor action and Senate transmission.
- Targeted stakeholdersAdopting the substitute ensures the most recent negotiated text governs debate and amendment consideration.
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4213) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
This House resolution sets the rules for considering H.R. 4213, the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill for FY2026.
It immediately brings the bill up, adopts an amendment-in-the-nature-of-a-substitute (H.R. 7481), waives points of order, limits debate to one hour, allows one motion to recommit, suspends two House rule clauses, and directs the Clerk to notify the Senate within three days of passage.
As a House privileged resolution governing floor procedure, it does not become law; it is likely to pass the House but is not a statute.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a standard, well-specified House floor-consideration rule: it clearly prescribes the procedures for immediate consideration of H.R. 4213, including adoption of a substitute, waiver of points of order, debate limitations, and a single motion to recommit.
Progressive worries waivers block oversight and civil‑liberties fixes.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersWaiving points of order reduces procedural checks that can identify drafting or jurisdictional defects.
- Targeted stakeholdersLimiting debate and amendments constrains minority input and detailed scrutiny of spending provisions.
- Targeted stakeholdersDeeming a substitute adopted prevents consideration of alternative amendments or member-proposed changes on the floor.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressive worries waivers block oversight and civil‑liberties fixes.
This persona sees the resolution as a procedural vehicle that expedites DHS funding but restricts floor debate and points of order.
They are cautiously concerned the adopted substitute and waived rules may block amendments protecting immigrants, civil liberties, or oversight; support depends on the substitute's content.
This persona views the resolution as a typical closed rule aimed at efficient consideration of an important appropriations bill.
They appreciate the orderly schedule and one motion to recommit, but want clarity on what H.R. 7481 changes and note that waiving rules concentrates decision-making.
This persona is inclined to favor rapid, disciplined consideration of a DHS funding bill to avoid gaps in security funding.
They generally support waiving procedural delays, but want assurance the substitute does not add excessive spending or weaken enforcement priorities.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a House privileged resolution governing floor procedure, it does not become law; it is likely to pass the House but is not a statute.
- Content and controversial provisions of the adopted substitute H.R. 7481
- House floor timing and whip counts on the day of consideration
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressive worries waivers block oversight and civil‑liberties fixes.
As a House privileged resolution governing floor procedure, it does not become law; it is likely to pass the House but is not a statute.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a standard, well-specified House floor-consideration rule: it clearly prescribes the procedures for immediate consideration of H.R. 4213, including adoption…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.