H. Res. 1102 (119th)Bill Overview

Removing Representative Tony Gonzalez of Texas from certain standing committees of the House of Representatives.

Congress|Congress
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 4, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution, sponsored by Representative Anna Paulina Luna and referred to the Committee on Ethics, would remove Representative Tony Gonzales of Texas from the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Homeland Security.

The resolution cites conduct reflecting poorly on the House but does not detail specific allegations or factual findings.

If adopted, it immediately strips Representative Gonzales of those committee assignments.

Passage45/100

As an internal House disciplinary measure, its fate hinges on the House majority and ethics process; procedurally simple but politically sensitive.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a straightforward administrative action that explicitly names the Member and the committees from which the Member is to be removed. It provides a clear operative command but limited supporting detail.

Contention65/100

Accountability versus due process: left favors removal; right demands documented evidence.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersSignals enforcement of House conduct rules, reinforcing institutional accountability.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay increase public confidence by demonstrating consequences for alleged misconduct.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRemoves influence of the member in appropriations decisions, reducing potential conflicts of interest.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesReduces constituent representation and direct influence on federal funding decisions.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay weaken oversight continuity on Homeland Security, losing member expertise.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates potential for partisan use of committee removals as a political tool.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Accountability versus due process: left favors removal; right demands documented evidence.
Progressive80%

Likely generally supportive of removing a member from sensitive committees when conduct undermines institutional integrity.

Would insist on Ethics transparency and a clear public record to avoid perceived unfairness.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautiously supportive of accountability but attentive to due process, precedent, and the practical effects on committee functioning.

Would favor action if based on verified Ethics findings and if contingency plans address governance gaps.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Skeptical of removal absent clear, public evidence; likely to view the move as potential partisan overreach that undermines voters' choices.

Prefers due process and formal Ethics findings before stripping committee roles.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

As an internal House disciplinary measure, its fate hinges on the House majority and ethics process; procedurally simple but politically sensitive.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Text lacks specifics of the cited conduct
  • Status and findings of any Ethics Committee investigation
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Accountability versus due process: left favors removal; right demands documented evidence.

As an internal House disciplinary measure, its fate hinges on the House majority and ethics process; procedurally simple but politically se…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a straightforward administrative action that explicitly names the Member and the committees from which the Member is to be removed. It provides a clear opera…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis