H. Res. 1111 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the 245th anniversary of the Battle of Guilford Courthouse and encouraging all United States citizens to visit the Guilford Courthouse National Military Park in Guilford County…

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Public Lands and Natural Resources
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 12, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution recognizes the 245th anniversary of the Battle of Guilford Courthouse, honors those who fought there, reiterates the battle’s historical significance, and encourages U.S. citizens to visit the Guilford Courthouse National Military Park in Guilford County, North Carolina.

Passage0/100

House simple resolution is non‑binding and does not create statutory law; it cannot become law through normal enactment.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses standard declarative language without attempting to create binding obligations or modify law.

Contention10/100

Progressives emphasize inclusion of Indigenous and enslaved peoples' narratives.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Local governmentsStates
Likely helped
  • Local governmentsMay increase visitation and provide a modest local economic boost from tourism spending.
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases public awareness and education about Revolutionary War history and regional heritage.
  • Targeted stakeholdersPromotes civic engagement and commemorative activities around the 250th anniversary of independence.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersResolution is ceremonial and does not authorize funding or change legal authorities.
  • StatesUses Congressional time for a nonbinding memorial statement, which critics may view as low priority.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay modestly increase visitor-related wear on park resources, requiring more maintenance.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize inclusion of Indigenous and enslaved peoples' narratives.
Progressive80%

Likely views the resolution as a benign, patriotic commemoration of Revolutionary War history, but would note the text omits broader context about Indigenous peoples, slavery, and differing historical perspectives.

Supportive of encouraging public access to a national park, with requests for inclusive interpretation and educational programming.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Sees the resolution as a low-stakes, bipartisan recognition that promotes history and tourism without creating policy commitments.

Views it as appropriate symbolic action, while noting it does not allocate funds or change law.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Likely strongly supportive as a patriotic tribute to Revolutionary War sacrifice and a promotion of civic pride and historical literacy.

Views encouragement to visit a national military park as appropriate and nonintrusive.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

House simple resolution is non‑binding and does not create statutory law; it cannot become law through normal enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House leadership schedules committee or floor consideration
  • Possible local or procedural amendments or companion measures
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize inclusion of Indigenous and enslaved peoples' narratives.

House simple resolution is non‑binding and does not create statutory law; it cannot become law through normal enactment.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses standard declarative language without attempting to create binding obliga…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis