H. Res. 1152 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing appreciation and recognition for the contributions of the American cowboy and historic cattle trails in advancing American history in celebration of the Nation's 250th anniversary.

Government Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Apr 2, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This non‑binding House resolution recognizes the historical contributions of the American cowboy and historic cattle trails as part of the United States’ 250th anniversary.

It highlights multicultural roots (Mexican, Black, Native American, White cowboys), lists major cattle trails and states traversed, praises economic and cultural impacts, and encourages local celebrations of this legacy.

Passage0/100

This is a nonbinding House resolution intended as recognition, not a statute; it does not become law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a conventional commemorative House resolution that succinctly states historical context and recognition, names relevant geographic and cultural elements, and encourages local celebrations without creating legal obligations or appropriations.

Contention25/100

Progressives stress historical harms and environmental costs

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Local governmentsMay prompt local heritage events that modestly increase tourism and visitor spending in communities.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould support museums and tourist sites in marketing cowboy‑related exhibits and programming.
  • Targeted stakeholdersAffirms diverse historical contributions by Mexican, Black, Native American, and White cowboys.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay be criticized for romanticizing cattle drives while overlooking Indigenous dispossession and conflict.
  • Federal agenciesCould be seen as symbolic only, since it authorizes no federal funding or programs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMight gloss over environmental effects of cattle ranching and large‑scale livestock production.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress historical harms and environmental costs
Progressive70%

Generally receptive to the multicultural recognition of Mexican, Black, and Native American cowboys, but cautious about romanticized narratives.

Will note missing harms tied to settler colonialism, Indigenous dispossession, and environmental impacts of the cattle industry.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Views the resolution as a low‑stakes, symbolic recognition likely to enjoy broad support.

Sees it as a reasonable acknowledgment of regional history and economic culture, while noting it does not carry policy or budgetary effects.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly favorable; views the resolution as a fitting celebration of American heritage, rural economies, and national character.

Appreciates emphasis on courage, independence, and the economic role of cattle drives.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a nonbinding House resolution intended as recognition, not a statute; it does not become law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether committee will report it for floor consideration
  • Whether House will prioritize symbolic resolutions on schedule
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress historical harms and environmental costs

This is a nonbinding House resolution intended as recognition, not a statute; it does not become law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a conventional commemorative House resolution that succinctly states historical context and recognition, names relevant geographic and cultural elements, and encou…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis