- Local governmentsRaises public awareness of home visiting benefits and available local programs.
- Local governmentsMay increase referrals to local services through outreach and publicity during the designated week.
- Targeted stakeholdersCould improve recruitment and retention by publicly recognizing home visitors and supervisors.
Supporting the designation of the week of April 20 through April 24, 2026, as "National Home Visiting Week".
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
This House resolution designates April 20–24, 2026, as “National Home Visiting Week” and affirms support for the goals and ideals of that week.
The text cites evidence and statistics about the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program, its reach, and benefits for children, families, workforce, and Tribal communities.
The resolution is symbolic and does not create new funding or legal requirements.
House simple resolutions are expressions of the chamber and do not become law; content-wise it will likely be adopted by the House but not enacted as statute.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, supplies contextual justification with program references and statistics, and precisely designates the week and name it intends to honor.
Liberal emphasizes funding and equity for expansion; conservatives worry about federal role.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Federal agenciesIs purely symbolic and creates no new federal funding, legal rights, or regulatory changes.
- Targeted stakeholdersMay raise public expectations without guaranteeing expanded services or staffing.
- Targeted stakeholdersDiverts legislative time to a non-binding resolution rather than substantive appropriations or reforms.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberal emphasizes funding and equity for expansion; conservatives worry about federal role.
Likely strongly supportive: views the resolution as positive recognition of evidence-based home visiting and a reinforcement of the 2022 reauthorization.
Would see it as helpful for public awareness, equity for Tribal communities, and advocacy for sustained or increased funding for proven programs.
Generally supportive but pragmatic: sees the resolution as a low-cost, bipartisan acknowledgment of early-childhood supports.
Views it mainly as symbolic and would want clarity on measurable outcomes, oversight, and fiscal implications before backing substantive expansions.
Cautiously accepting but reserved: the resolution is a symbolic recognition of family support services, which many conservatives find uncontroversial.
However, there is concern about federal program emphasis, potential justification for further federal spending, and preference for state/local solutions.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
House simple resolutions are expressions of the chamber and do not become law; content-wise it will likely be adopted by the House but not enacted as statute.
- Whether the House will consider it under suspension calendar
- Existence of a companion Senate resolution
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberal emphasizes funding and equity for expansion; conservatives worry about federal role.
House simple resolutions are expressions of the chamber and do not become law; content-wise it will likely be adopted by the House but not…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, supplies contextual justification with program references and statisti…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.