H. Res. 1177 (119th)Bill Overview

Impeaching Peter B. Hegseth, Secretary of Defense of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Government Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 15, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This resolution impeaches Secretary of Defense Peter B.

Hegseth, alleging high crimes and misdemeanors.

It presents six articles accusing him of initiating unauthorized hostilities with Iran, violating the laws of armed conflict, mishandling classified information, obstructing Congress, politicizing the military, and bringing disrepute upon the Department of Defense.

Passage15/100

Impeachment resolution may pass a sympathetic House but achieving Senate conviction and removal is rare and difficult.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution conforms to the structural norms of an impeachment instrument: it impeaches the named official and sets out multiple articles of alleged 'high crimes and misdemeanors' organized into numbered clauses, and it references relevant constitutional and international legal frameworks. The document is clear in purpose and sufficiently specific in charge categories to put the House and the Senate on notice of the grounds for impeachment.

Contention75/100

Whether Secretary initiated unauthorized war versus exercising defense authority.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
SeniorsTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersReinforces congressional oversight and the constitutional war powers role of the legislature.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSignals accountability for alleged violations of the law of armed conflict and civilian protection.
  • SeniorsAims to deter future unauthorized military actions by senior officials.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay be viewed as politicizing military accountability and exacerbate civil-military tensions.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould disrupt Defense Department leadership and continuity during active operations, risking readiness.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSets a precedent that could broaden impeachment use for disputed policy or operational decisions.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Whether Secretary initiated unauthorized war versus exercising defense authority.
Progressive90%

Likely views the resolution as necessary accountability for alleged abuses of power, unlawful use of force, and discriminatory personnel actions.

Emphasizes enforcing constitutional war powers, protecting civilians and servicemembers, and upholding civil‑military norms.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautious support for oversight but insists on strong factual grounding and narrow scope.

Wants due process, bipartisan fact-finding, and careful consideration of national security tradeoffs before endorsing removal.

Split reaction
Conservative15%

Likely views the resolution as a partisan attack that risks undermining civilian leadership of the military and command effectiveness.

Skeptical of the allegations absent clear criminal conduct and concerned about national security consequences.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood15/100

Impeachment resolution may pass a sympathetic House but achieving Senate conviction and removal is rare and difficult.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Availability and weight of evidence supporting the allegations
  • Degree of bipartisan support in the House
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Whether Secretary initiated unauthorized war versus exercising defense authority.

Impeachment resolution may pass a sympathetic House but achieving Senate conviction and removal is rare and difficult.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution conforms to the structural norms of an impeachment instrument: it impeaches the named official and sets out multiple articles of alleged 'high crimes and misdem…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis