Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
This resolution is a formal action by the House to expel one of its members and would remove her from office if adopted. It invokes the House's constitutional authority to discipline its Members and lists alleged misconduct as the basis for expulsion. If the House votes to adopt the resolution, the named Representative would immediately lose her seat; this is an internal congressional disciplinary action, not a law sent to the President.
The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the House for expulsion, and the decision is made solely by the House without presentation to the President; the resolution text indicates referral to the House Committee on Ethics for review.
This resolution directs the House to expel Representative Nancy Mace pursuant to Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution.
The text lists multiple allegations and incidents — including a court gag order, deposition testimony alleging attempted blackmail, alleged misuse of taxpayer reimbursements, campaign solicitation in the Capitol, workplace toxicity claims, ethics fines, and confrontations with law enforcement — and concludes with a single provision declaring her expelled.
Highly targeted, politically fraught measure with a very high procedural bar and no compromise mechanisms; House expulsion historically rare absent criminal convictions.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct expulsory resolution: it clearly states the outcome (expulsion) and furnishes a lengthy narrative of alleged misconduct. It reasonably cites constitutional authority and relevant rules but provides little procedural or evidentiary structure, no discussion of post-expulsion administrative consequences, and no accountability or oversight mechanisms.
Liberals emphasize accountability; conservatives emphasize voter choice and due process.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize accountability; conservatives emphasize voter choice and due process.
Likely to view the bill as a serious accountability measure addressing repeated alleged ethical violations and abusive conduct.
Supporters would stress the pattern of allegations undermines public trust, while many would still want formal Ethics Committee confirmation before final action.
Centrists will emphasize process and evidentiary standards: they may find the allegations serious but will worry about bypassing or rushing the Ethics Committee and judicial processes.
Many would be open to expulsion only after an independent, bipartisan investigation and clear findings.
Mainstream conservatives will generally oppose this resolution as politically motivated and an overreach absent criminal conviction or clear bipartisan Ethics findings.
They will stress voters' choice, due process, and free-speech concerns about disciplining controversial speech.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Highly targeted, politically fraught measure with a very high procedural bar and no compromise mechanisms; House expulsion historically rare absent criminal convictions.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize accountability; conservatives emphasize voter choice and due process.
Highly targeted, politically fraught measure with a very high procedural bar and no compromise mechanisms; House expulsion historically rar…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct expulsory resolution: it clearly states the outcome (expulsion) and furnishes a lengthy narrative of alleged misconduct. It reasonably cites constitutiona…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.