- Targeted stakeholdersAlters House records to remove formal entries of the two impeachments, symbolically clearing the congressional record.
- Targeted stakeholdersProvides political vindication messaging and boosts morale among the sponsor's political allies.
- Targeted stakeholdersSignals congressional attention to alleged investigative and procedural defects in those impeachment processes.
Expunging the December 18, 2019, and January 13, 2021, Impeachments of President Donald Trump.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This House resolution would "expunge" the House-passed impeachments of President Donald J.
Trump from December 18, 2019, and January 13, 2021, declaring them as if they never passed the House.
The preamble cites newly declassified material and alleges political bias and procedural unfairness during those prior proceedings.
Symbolic, low-cost measure could pass the House if majority supports, but is highly partisan and unlikely to gain broader congressional or legal effect.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly focused declarative resolution that explicates its purpose and rationale but provides minimal operational detail. It largely functions as a symbolic statement rather than as a procedural directive that would effect comprehensive record changes or legal consequences.
Progressive: views expungement as undermining accountability.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersUndermines congressional precedent by erasing past actions, possibly weakening institutional continuity.
- Targeted stakeholdersMay be perceived as politicizing legislative records, increasing polarization and partisan retaliation.
- Targeted stakeholdersDoes not change Senate outcomes, judicial records, or any criminal liability, limiting substantive legal effect.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressive: views expungement as undermining accountability.
Likely to view the resolution as a partisan, symbolic rewrite of congressional history designed to politically vindicate President Trump.
Will emphasize that expungement does not change the facts or the constitutional purpose of impeachment, and will worry about precedent.
Will see some legitimate procedural concerns in the preamble but worry about the wisdom of erasing House actions.
Tends to favor due process and institutional norms, so prefers a neutral review over unilateral expungement.
Likely to strongly support the resolution as corrective and vindicating, viewing it as an appropriate rebuke of partisan impeachment processes and restoration of President Trump's reputation.
Will treat the preamble's claims of bias and new evidence as justification.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Symbolic, low-cost measure could pass the House if majority supports, but is highly partisan and unlikely to gain broader congressional or legal effect.
- Whether the House majority will support a partisan symbolic expungement
- Procedural route and priority on the House floor calendar
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressive: views expungement as undermining accountability.
Symbolic, low-cost measure could pass the House if majority supports, but is highly partisan and unlikely to gain broader congressional or…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly focused declarative resolution that explicates its purpose and rationale but provides minimal operational detail. It largely functions as a symbo…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.