H. Res. 1220 (119th)Bill Overview

Condemning the attempted assassination of President Donald J. Trump on April 25, 2026, condemning the multiple attempts against the President's life…

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 28, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for cons…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution condemns the attempted assassination of President Donald J.

Trump on April 25, 2026, and previous attempts in July and September 2024; thanks responding law enforcement; affirms the Secret Service’s lead protective role; recognizes the FBI and MPD roles in Washington, D.C.; underscores the importance of the Department of Homeland Security and full funding for its components; and calls on Americans to reject political violence and incitement.

The text also references the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner as a First Amendment event and includes a partisan clause blaming a lapse in DHS appropriations on "radical Democrat demands."

Passage3/100

This is a non‑binding House resolution with partisan language; such measures rarely translate into binding law or cross‑chamber enactment.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward symbolic House resolution that unambiguously condemns specific assassination attempts, thanks responders, and recognizes agency roles and DHS funding importance. Its form and level of detail are consistent with commemorative expressions.

Contention60/100

Partisan clause blaming Democrats divides support and tones of the resolution

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersReaffirms support for Secret Service and may bolster public and legislative backing for protective agencies.
  • Targeted stakeholdersExpresses gratitude to responding law enforcement, potentially improving officer morale and public recognition.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRecognizes DHS mission and calls for full funding, potentially influencing appropriations debates.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncludes language blaming particular political actors for funding lapses, which may politicize security discussions.
  • Targeted stakeholdersIs a nonbinding resolution with no appropriations, so it does not directly increase DHS funding or create jobs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersBroad condemnation language could be interpreted to chill protected political speech or dissent.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Partisan clause blaming Democrats divides support and tones of the resolution
Progressive65%

Supports condemning assassination attempts and protecting public servants, while criticizing partisan framing.

Concerned the resolution conflates political opposition with violent incitement and lacks attention to civil liberties or root causes.

Split reaction
Centrist80%

Views the resolution as a largely appropriate symbolic response condemning violence and thanking responders, but sees unnecessary partisan language that undermines bipartisan unity.

Prefers a cleaner, less politicized text and clearer funding/oversight proposals.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly approves: condemning assassination attempts, defending the President, praising law enforcement, and calling for full DHS funding align with priorities.

Appreciates the text’s attribution of funding lapses to Democratic actors.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood3/100

This is a non‑binding House resolution with partisan language; such measures rarely translate into binding law or cross‑chamber enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House leadership will schedule a floor vote
  • Degree of bipartisan appetite given explicit partisan phrasing
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Partisan clause blaming Democrats divides support and tones of the resolution

This is a non‑binding House resolution with partisan language; such measures rarely translate into binding law or cross‑chamber enactment.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward symbolic House resolution that unambiguously condemns specific assassination attempts, thanks responders, and recognizes agency roles and DHS fun…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis