H. Res. 1222 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the designation of the week of April 24 through April 30 as the annual "National Reentry Week".

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 28, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution designates the week of April 24–30 as the annual "National Reentry Week." It documents U.S. incarceration and recidivism statistics, encourages the Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons to coordinate reentry events, and urges Congress to increase access to housing, education, occupational training, and mental health services to improve reentry outcomes.

The resolution is a non‑binding statement of principles and national recognition rather than a funding or regulatory enactment.

Passage0/100

As a simple House resolution it expresses the House's sentiment only and cannot become binding federal law; likelihood of becoming law is effectively zero.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a commemorative House resolution that documents concerns about reentry and mass incarceration, designates an annual National Reentry Week, and encourages but does not require agency action.

Contention18/100

Preferred scale of federal involvement and funding obligations.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Housing marketLocal governments
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersRaises national awareness of reentry challenges and mobilizes stakeholders to prioritize reintegration supports.
  • Targeted stakeholdersEncourages DOJ and BOP coordination of reentry events, potentially improving information-sharing and program alignment.
  • Housing marketSupports advocacy for increased funding and legislative attention to housing, education, training, and mental health se…
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersThe resolution is non-binding and does not appropriate funds or create enforceable legal obligations.
  • Targeted stakeholdersWithout dedicated funding, recognition alone may not change recidivism or materially improve reentry services.
  • Local governmentsFederal encouragement may have limited effect, as reentry programs often rely on state and local implementation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Preferred scale of federal involvement and funding obligations.
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive; views the resolution as affirming the need for justice reform and investment in reentry supports.

Sees it as useful national attention to systemic drivers of recidivism, but insufficient without funding and concrete statutory changes.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally favorable, viewing the resolution as a pragmatic, bipartisan acknowledgment that reentry reduces recidivism and saves money long term.

Would want clearer metrics, pilot programs, and careful fiscal analysis before supporting new spending.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Cautiously supportive if reentry efforts prioritize public safety, accountability, and lower recidivism.

Concerned about expanded taxpayer costs, perceived leniency, and increased federal involvement without state consent or performance metrics.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a simple House resolution it expresses the House's sentiment only and cannot become binding federal law; likelihood of becoming law is effectively zero.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House leadership will schedule it for consideration
  • Potential targeted objections from members over language
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Preferred scale of federal involvement and funding obligations.

As a simple House resolution it expresses the House's sentiment only and cannot become binding federal law; likelihood of becoming law is e…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a commemorative House resolution that documents concerns about reentry and mass incarceration, designates an annual National Reentry Week, and encourages…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis