- Targeted stakeholdersIncreases public awareness of scams, potentially reducing victimization through education and prevention.
- Targeted stakeholdersMay boost reporting to agencies and law enforcement, improving data for investigations and enforcement.
- Local governmentsEncourages federal, state, local, private, and nonprofit coordination against scam operations.
Supporting the designation of May 14, 2026, as "National Scam Survivor Day".
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
This resolution expresses the House's support for designating May 14, 2026, as National Scam Survivor Day and urges increased public awareness, support for survivors, and coordination among government and non-government groups. It does not create new legal rights or obligations and does not change Federal law. In practice, it is a formal expression of the House's views and encouragements, not a binding rule.
This is a simple House resolution introduced and considered only in the House of Representatives; it would be adopted by a majority vote in the House, is not presented to the President, and does not have the force of law.
This House resolution supports designating May 14, 2026, as "National Scam Survivor Day." It cites rising scam losses and evolving scam methods (social media, cryptocurrency, AI deepfakes), highlights vulnerable groups, and encourages public awareness, use of federal resources, law enforcement action, and collaboration among government, private, and nonprofit actors.
The resolution is symbolic and contains no binding spending or regulatory provisions.
As a nonbinding House resolution it is likely to pass the House but not create law; becoming a formal law would require additional Senate action uncommon for symbolic days.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a typical commemorative resolution: it clearly defines and justifies a designated day and urges awareness and cooperative action but does not assert binding mechanisms, funding, or statutory changes.
Liberals want stronger enforcement and funding; conservatives fear federal expansion.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersNonbinding symbolic resolution provides no funding or new legal authorities, limiting practical effects.
- Targeted stakeholdersOne-day designation may not produce sustained behavior change or long-term reductions in scam losses.
- Federal agenciesCould create public expectations for federal action without appropriated resources or enforcement changes.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals want stronger enforcement and funding; conservatives fear federal expansion.
Overall supportive as a consumer-protection and public-awareness measure.
Sees value in recognizing victims and encouraging coordination among agencies and nonprofits, but may view it as insufficient without stronger enforcement or funding for prevention efforts.
Generally favorable as a low-cost, noncontroversial awareness resolution.
Values the focus on measurable outreach and law enforcement collaboration, while wanting clarity on implementation and cost implications of any follow-up efforts.
Likely supportive of the symbolic designation and law-enforcement emphasis, but cautious about language encouraging federal expansion.
Favors private-sector collaboration and targeted enforcement over new bureaucratic programs.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a nonbinding House resolution it is likely to pass the House but not create law; becoming a formal law would require additional Senate action uncommon for symbolic days.
- Whether a Senate companion or concurrent resolution will be introduced
- Potential procedural objections in committee or floor scheduling
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals want stronger enforcement and funding; conservatives fear federal expansion.
As a nonbinding House resolution it is likely to pass the House but not create law; becoming a formal law would require additional Senate a…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a typical commemorative resolution: it clearly defines and justifies a designated day and urges awareness and cooperative action but does not assert bind…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.