H. Res. 1288 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting the designation of May 14, 2026, as "National Scam Survivor Day".

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
May 14, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the House's support for designating May 14, 2026, as National Scam Survivor Day and urges increased public awareness, support for survivors, and coordination among government and non-government groups. It does not create new legal rights or obligations and does not change Federal law. In practice, it is a formal expression of the House's views and encouragements, not a binding rule.

Passage rules

This is a simple House resolution introduced and considered only in the House of Representatives; it would be adopted by a majority vote in the House, is not presented to the President, and does not have the force of law.

This House resolution supports designating May 14, 2026, as "National Scam Survivor Day." It cites rising scam losses and evolving scam methods (social media, cryptocurrency, AI deepfakes), highlights vulnerable groups, and encourages public awareness, use of federal resources, law enforcement action, and collaboration among government, private, and nonprofit actors.

The resolution is symbolic and contains no binding spending or regulatory provisions.

Passage20/100

As a nonbinding House resolution it is likely to pass the House but not create law; becoming a formal law would require additional Senate action uncommon for symbolic days.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a typical commemorative resolution: it clearly defines and justifies a designated day and urges awareness and cooperative action but does not assert binding mechanisms, funding, or statutory changes.

Contention15/100

Liberals want stronger enforcement and funding; conservatives fear federal expansion.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases public awareness of scams, potentially reducing victimization through education and prevention.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay boost reporting to agencies and law enforcement, improving data for investigations and enforcement.
  • Local governmentsEncourages federal, state, local, private, and nonprofit coordination against scam operations.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersNonbinding symbolic resolution provides no funding or new legal authorities, limiting practical effects.
  • Targeted stakeholdersOne-day designation may not produce sustained behavior change or long-term reductions in scam losses.
  • Federal agenciesCould create public expectations for federal action without appropriated resources or enforcement changes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals want stronger enforcement and funding; conservatives fear federal expansion.
Progressive90%

Overall supportive as a consumer-protection and public-awareness measure.

Sees value in recognizing victims and encouraging coordination among agencies and nonprofits, but may view it as insufficient without stronger enforcement or funding for prevention efforts.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally favorable as a low-cost, noncontroversial awareness resolution.

Values the focus on measurable outreach and law enforcement collaboration, while wanting clarity on implementation and cost implications of any follow-up efforts.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Likely supportive of the symbolic designation and law-enforcement emphasis, but cautious about language encouraging federal expansion.

Favors private-sector collaboration and targeted enforcement over new bureaucratic programs.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood20/100

As a nonbinding House resolution it is likely to pass the House but not create law; becoming a formal law would require additional Senate action uncommon for symbolic days.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a Senate companion or concurrent resolution will be introduced
  • Potential procedural objections in committee or floor scheduling
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals want stronger enforcement and funding; conservatives fear federal expansion.

As a nonbinding House resolution it is likely to pass the House but not create law; becoming a formal law would require additional Senate a…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a typical commemorative resolution: it clearly defines and justifies a designated day and urges awareness and cooperative action but does not assert bind…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis