H. Res. 1337 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the contributions of academic medicine and observing Academic Medicine Week from June 8 through 12, 2026.

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jun 3, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a House simple resolution that designates June 8 through 12, 2026 as Academic Medicine Week and expresses the House's support for and recognition of academic medicine. It is a nonbinding statement by the House only and does not create law, change federal programs, or require action by the President. The text highlights the roles of medical schools, teaching hospitals, researchers, and trainees and encourages the public to recognize their contributions.

This House resolution designates June 8–12, 2026 as Academic Medicine Week, recognizes the contributions of academic medicine and the AAMC, and encourages strong federal support for graduate medical education, HRSA workforce programs, medical research, clinical care, and community collaborations.

It cites statistics on AAMC-member institutions’ training role, economic impact, VA partnership, and clinical services, and affirms the importance of addressing projected physician shortages.

Passage0/100

As a simple House resolution expressing sentiment, it does not create law or require presidential approval; therefore it cannot become binding law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly articulates its purpose and supplies the minimal mechanics appropriate for designating an observance week.

Contention50/100

Left emphasizes funding GME and HRSA; right fears federal spending growth.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesCommunities · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitElevates public and legislative attention to physician workforce shortages and training needs.
  • Federal agenciesSupports arguments for increased federal funding for graduate medical education and workforce programs.
  • Potential benefitHighlights the role of academic medicine in medical research and innovation, reinforcing NIH partnerships.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenResolution is symbolic and nonbinding, creating no new funding or legal obligations.
  • CommunitiesMay be viewed as privileging academic medical centers over community providers or nonacademic care settings.
  • Federal agenciesCalls for increased Medicare GME or federal support could imply higher federal spending or budget tradeoffs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes funding GME and HRSA; right fears federal spending growth.
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive.

Sees the resolution as a useful recognition and platform to press for stronger federal investments in training, research, and underserved communities.

Views emphasis on HRSA and GME as aligned with progressive priorities.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally supportive but pragmatic.

Views the resolution as a non-binding recognition that correctly identifies workforce and research challenges, while wanting measurable outcomes and fiscal realism before expanding federal commitments.

Leans supportive
Conservative45%

Mixed to somewhat skeptical.

Willing to honor medical schools and trainees but cautious about language encouraging expanded federal spending and programs like Medicare GME or HRSA.

Supports recognition but resists policy implications.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a simple House resolution expressing sentiment, it does not create law or require presidential approval; therefore it cannot become binding law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule floor consideration promptly
  • Potential, though unlikely, objections or holds in committee
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes funding GME and HRSA; right fears federal spending growth.

As a simple House resolution expressing sentiment, it does not create law or require presidential approval; therefore it cannot become bind…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly articulates its purpose and supplies the minimal mechanics appropriate for designating an observance…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis