Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
This resolution is a statement by the House supporting designation of June 14 through June 21, 2026 as National Men's Health Week and asking the President to issue a proclamation. It does not create law, change federal programs, or authorize spending. It is non-binding and is intended to raise awareness about men's health.
As a simple House resolution, it would be adopted only by the House of Representatives and is not sent to the President; it has no force of law and imposes no legal requirements.
House Resolution 1355 expresses the House's support for designating June 14–21, 2026, as "National Men’s Health Week," cites statistics about men's health disparities and diseases, encourages awareness of preventive care and early detection, and requests the President issue a proclamation urging observance with appropriate activities.
Very likely to be adopted as a House resolution; however, it is nonbinding and does not itself create law or require enactment.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly defines the problem motivating the observance and specifies the dates and a request for a Presidential proclamation. It does not and need not include detailed implementation, fiscal, or enforcement provisions.
Progressive wants policy/funding to follow symbolism
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressive wants policy/funding to follow symbolism
Likely supportive of the awareness goals and the focus on disparities, especially racial gaps in life expectancy and cancer outcomes.
Views the resolution as a useful, low-cost awareness tool but an incomplete response without policies expanding access to care and addressing social determinants of health.
Generally favorable as a bipartisan, low-cost awareness resolution that encourages preventive care.
Wants emphasis on evidence-based screening and clarity that the resolution does not mandate medical practices or new spending without authorization.
Likely supportive of encouraging personal responsibility for health and community-driven observances, but cautious about federal government activism or spending.
Sees the resolution as acceptable so long as it remains symbolic and does not expand federal programs.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very likely to be adopted as a House resolution; however, it is nonbinding and does not itself create law or require enactment.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressive wants policy/funding to follow symbolism
Very likely to be adopted as a House resolution; however, it is nonbinding and does not itself create law or require enactment.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly defines the problem motivating the observance and specifies the dates and a request for a Presiden…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.