H. Res. 1383 (119th)Bill Overview

Commemorating the one-year anniversary of the enactment of the Working Families Tax Cuts.

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jun 24, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a House simple resolution that commemorates the one-year anniversary of the Working Families Tax Cuts and expresses the House's support for those tax policies. It does not change tax law, create enforceable rights, or require action by the President or the Senate. It simply records the House's position and recognition of the law's effects. Such resolutions are symbolic and non-binding.

House Resolution 1383 is a nonbinding resolution commemorating the one-year anniversary of the Working Families Tax Cuts (Public Law 119–21).

The resolution praises the law’s many provisions — including broad tax cuts, expanded child and retirement-related benefits, small business and R&D incentives, health savings and telehealth access, a $50 billion rural health program, energy leasing and a 10-year ban on a natural gas tax, border security investments and barrier funding, and defense modernization — and expresses support for policies it says benefit families, small businesses, seniors, and workers.

Passage0/100

House simple resolutions are non‑binding and do not become statute; adoption by the House is possible but does not create law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a conventional commemorative House resolution: it clearly articulates the occasion and reasons for commemoration and employs the expected ceremonial operative clauses without attempting to create legal obligations, funding, or administrative changes.

Contention74/100

Progressives emphasize climate and regressivity concerns; conservatives back energy and tax permanence

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Taxpayers · ConsumersFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • TaxpayersAffirms that many taxpayers received immediate tax relief, reinforcing public awareness of enacted tax changes.
  • Potential benefitSignals support that may reassure businesses and encourage investment due to perceived tax certainty.
  • ConsumersEmphasizes expanded telehealth and HSA eligibility could reduce out-of-pocket medical costs for some consumers.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs purely commemorative and does not itself change tax law, budgets, or regulatory requirements.
  • Federal agenciesPermanent tax cuts could reduce federal revenues and contribute to larger deficits absent offsetting measures.
  • Potential burdenCritics may argue benefits disproportionately favor corporations or higher-income households over lower-income groups.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize climate and regressivity concerns; conservatives back energy and tax permanence
Progressive20%

Likely skeptical.

Views the resolution as a political celebration of a tax law that contains some popular provisions but also includes permanent tax cuts favoring wealth and fossil-fuel and border-barrier spending the persona opposes.

Appreciates expansions for child credit, rural health, and telehealth but worries about distributional and climate impacts.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed.

Sees legitimate tangible benefits (tax simplification, child credit, small business certainty, rural health investment) but worries about fiscal cost, permanence of certain tax cuts, and tradeoffs with climate and border policy.

Would seek offsets, oversight, and targeted implementation.

Split reaction
Conservative95%

Strongly favorable.

Views the resolution as appropriate recognition of a major pro-growth, pro-energy, pro-border-security tax package that reduces taxes for most filers and boosts small business and national security.

Sees permanent reforms as necessary for certainty and growth.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

House simple resolutions are non‑binding and do not become statute; adoption by the House is possible but does not create law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House leadership will schedule floor consideration
  • Degree of partisan roll-call opposition if debated
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize climate and regressivity concerns; conservatives back energy and tax permanence

House simple resolutions are non‑binding and do not become statute; adoption by the House is possible but does not create law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a conventional commemorative House resolution: it clearly articulates the occasion and reasons for commemoration and employs the expected ceremonial operative clau…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis