H. Res. 1394 (119th)Bill Overview

Condemning prosecution policies that give preferential treatment to foreign nationals over United States citizens.

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jun 29, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a non-binding statement passed only by the House of Representatives that condemns prosecution policies it says favor foreign nationals over United States citizens. It does not change criminal law or create new legal rights or penalties. The resolution expresses the House's views, praises prosecutors and the Department of Justice for certain actions, and urges state and local prosecutors to prosecute crimes without considering immigration status. Because this is a simple House resolution, it applies only to the chamber that adopts it and does not have the force of law.

Passage rules

Simple resolutions are acted on by only one chamber of Congress, are not sent to the President, and do not create binding law. Passage in the House follows the chamber's normal voting rules and typically requires a majority vote.

This House resolution condemns prosecution policies that it says give preferential treatment to foreign nationals over U.S. citizens.

It affirms equal treatment under the law, applauds prosecutors who prosecute all criminals regardless of immigration status, urges state and local prosecutors to do the same, and praises the Department of Justice for investigating sanctuary-jurisdiction prosecution policies.

The measure is a non‑binding congressional resolution expressing the House's views.

Passage1/100

House simple resolution is nonbinding and does not create law; adoption is symbolic, not statutory change.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward symbolic resolution consisting of findings and nonbinding statements that condemn certain prosecution policies and urge actors to act. It does not create new legal obligations or change statutory authority; it mainly expresses the House's views and commends or implores specified actors.

Contention72/100

Progressives see stigma and threats to community trust; conservatives see crime control.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLocal governments · Immigrants

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitSupports public safety by urging prosecution of offenders without regard to immigration status.
  • Potential benefitReinforces a message of equal treatment under law for citizens and noncitizens.
  • Federal agenciesSignals federal backing for DOJ investigations, potentially prompting further oversight actions.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsMay pressure local prosecutors and reduce state and local prosecutorial discretion.
  • ImmigrantsCould erode trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement, lowering crime reporting.
  • Local governmentsMight lead to increased prosecutions and incarceration, raising local justice system costs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives see stigma and threats to community trust; conservatives see crime control.
Progressive25%

Likely critical of the resolution’s framing.

Supporters of prosecutorial discretion and immigrant‑friendly policies will view the text as conflating immigration status with criminality and potentially encouraging profiling.

They may agree with victims' rights and equal treatment language but worry the resolution undermines community trust and local autonomy.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

Views the resolution as a symbolic statement emphasizing rule of law and victim protection, while recognizing legitimate local prosecutorial discretion.

Centrists will likely want clearer evidence of preferential treatment and caution against federal interference in state/local criminal justice choices.

Split reaction
Conservative95%

Strongly supportive.

Sees the resolution as defending public safety, opposing sanctuary policies, and urging consistent prosecution regardless of immigration status.

Applauds DOJ scrutiny and views the measure as correcting preferential treatment for noncitizens.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood1/100

House simple resolution is nonbinding and does not create law; adoption is symbolic, not statutory change.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Level of House floor support and party‑line voting dynamics
  • Whether a companion or follow‑on Senate measure will be filed
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives see stigma and threats to community trust; conservatives see crime control.

House simple resolution is nonbinding and does not create law; adoption is symbolic, not statutory change.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward symbolic resolution consisting of findings and nonbinding statements that condemn certain prosecution policies and urge actors to act. It does no…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis