H. Res. 1395 (119th)Bill Overview

Designate June 29-July 4, 2026 as National Tire Safety Week

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jun 29, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a simple House resolution that expresses the House of Representatives' support for designating June 29 through July 4, 2026 as National Tire Safety Week and for the goals of that observance. It encourages Americans to take part in events and to learn about proper tire care and maintenance. It does not create a law, change federal regulations, or require states or private parties to act; it is a nonbinding statement of the House's position. If adopted, it serves as a formal recognition and public awareness effort led by the House.

This House resolution designates June 29 through July 4, 2026, as "National Tire Safety Week" and formally supports the goals of that observance.

It cites tire-safety facts, encourages public education, participation in events, and efforts to reduce tire-related accidents, fatalities, and injuries.

The resolution is a non-binding expression of support and contains no new regulatory mandates or funding.

Passage5/100

Non-binding House resolution unlikely to become law; high chance of House adoption but it does not create statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states the topic and rationale (tire safety) and formally designates a week while encouraging public participation. It does not establish programs, funding, or statutory changes, which is consistent with a symbolic observance.

Contention12/100

All agree on safety value; disagreement centers on funding and follow-up

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedManufacturers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreased public awareness could reduce tire-related accidents and fatalities.
  • Potential benefitProper tire maintenance can improve fuel economy and reduce vehicle emissions.
  • Potential benefitLonger tire life and fewer repairs may yield modest cost savings for motorists.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenThe resolution is symbolic and creates no enforceable requirements or dedicated funding.
  • ManufacturersIndustry involvement could bias messaging toward manufacturers' interests over impartial safety advice.
  • Potential burdenAttention and limited resources may be diverted from other safety programs needing funding.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

All agree on safety value; disagreement centers on funding and follow-up
Progressive85%

Generally supportive of vehicle- and public-safety measures that protect vulnerable road users.

Views the resolution as a low-cost way to promote safety and reduce harm, while noting industry influence in the historical record.

Might want complementary programs to ensure low-income motorists can access tire maintenance services.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Views the resolution as common-sense, noncontroversial, and largely symbolic.

Appreciates public-safety messaging and minimal federal footprint, but expects measurable outreach rather than empty declarations.

Concerned about any downstream unfunded mandates if momentum grows.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely supportive because it promotes personal responsibility and voluntary safety measures without creating new regulations or spending.

Prefers private-sector and consumer-choice approaches and will resist any follow-on federal mandates.

Skeptical of federal campaigning if used as justification for regulation.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

Non-binding House resolution unlikely to become law; high chance of House adoption but it does not create statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House leadership schedules it for floor consideration
  • If a companion or similar Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

All agree on safety value; disagreement centers on funding and follow-up

Non-binding House resolution unlikely to become law; high chance of House adoption but it does not create statutory law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states the topic and rationale (tire safety) and formally designates a week while encouraging public partic…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis