H. Res. 1397 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing support for the designation of June 28, 2026, as "Community is Stronger than Cancer Day".

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jun 29, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the House of Representatives' support for designating June 28, 2026 as "Community Is Stronger Than Cancer Day" and encourages Americans to support those affected by cancer. It is a nonbinding statement by one chamber of Congress and does not create law, require executive action, or impose legal duties. The resolution is meant to promote awareness and community support but does not change government programs or spending.

Passage rules

This is a simple House resolution considered only by the House of Representatives; it does not go to the Senate or the President and does not have the force of law. Adoption typically requires a majority vote in the House under standard procedures.

This resolution expresses support for designating June 28, 2026, as "Community Is Stronger Than Cancer Day." It cites cancer prevalence and caregiver estimates, notes the Day began in 2021 and will be observed at about 200 locations in 2026, and encourages people to support patients, survivors, and caregivers while breaking down barriers to care.

The resolution is a non‑binding expression of support and encouragement rather than a law or funding authorization.

Passage0/100

As a House simple resolution, it is nonbinding and does not become law; it only expresses the House's view.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it states the date and rationale for designation, offers encouragement to the public, and contains no binding obligations, funding requests, or statutory changes.

Contention8/100

Progressives stress need for substantive policy alongside symbolism.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · CommunitiesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCan reduce stigma and foster social connection for survivors and affected families.
  • Federal agenciesImposes minimal federal administrative burden because it is a symbolic, non-binding resolution.
  • CommunitiesRaises public awareness about cancer and community support needs nationwide.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs largely symbolic and does not authorize funding or create new programs.
  • Potential burdenContains no enforcement mechanisms to ensure barriers to care are actually reduced.
  • Potential burdenMay divert attention from resource-intensive, evidence-based policy solutions requiring funding.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress need for substantive policy alongside symbolism.
Progressive80%

Generally supportive of the symbolic recognition and the message of community support, but likely to press for concrete policy action addressing access, equity, and funding for cancer care.

May view the resolution as useful awareness-raising but insufficient alone to address disparities or affordability.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Likely welcomes the bipartisan, low-cost, nonbinding nature of the resolution as a constructive awareness effort.

Sees benefits in community engagement while noting the limits of symbolism and the need for measurable follow-up where appropriate.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely to view the resolution as a benign, voluntary expression of support for communities affected by cancer, with minimal federal implication.

May nevertheless caution against using federal bodies to create many commemorative observances or implied obligations.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a House simple resolution, it is nonbinding and does not become law; it only expresses the House's view.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House committee will schedule the resolution for floor consideration
  • Whether a companion or identical Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress need for substantive policy alongside symbolism.

As a House simple resolution, it is nonbinding and does not become law; it only expresses the House's view.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it states the date and rationale for designation, offers encouragement to the public, and contains no binding…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis