H. Res. 1402 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting the goals and ideals of Alzheimer's and Brain Awareness Month.

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jun 30, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the House of Representatives support for Alzheimer’s and Brain Awareness Month and encourages education, advocacy, and support for people affected by Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. It is a formal statement of the House's views and intentions, not a law and not enforceable. The resolution raises awareness and recommends actions to the public but does not require executive or state action.

Passage rules

This is a simple resolution acted on only by the House; it does not go to the Senate or the President and is not legally binding. It is adopted under the House's standard procedures, typically by majority vote.

This House resolution expresses support for Alzheimer’s and Brain Awareness Month.

It summarizes prevalence, caregiver burdens, health disparities, and economic costs, and encourages Americans to learn about, advocate for, and support research, care, and caregivers.

The measure is a non-binding, symbolic statement without authorizing funds or new programs.

Passage0/100

As a House simple resolution it expresses sentiment and is not a law; therefore it cannot become law by design.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states the problem, provides supporting statistics and rationale, and articulates specific, high-level encouragements for public education, advocacy, and support.

Contention10/100

Liberal emphasizes need for follow-up funding and equity programs

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
CommunitiesStates

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreased public awareness could promote earlier diagnosis and improved care planning for affected individuals.
  • Potential benefitEncouraging advocacy may raise public pressure that could eventually increase research and program funding.
  • CommunitiesCalling attention to caregiver burdens could validate caregivers and bolster community and nonprofit support services.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenThe resolution is ceremonial and creates no binding requirements, funding, or regulatory changes.
  • StatesSymbolic statements risk substituting for or delaying substantive policy, funding, or healthcare reforms.
  • Potential burdenAwareness alone may not meaningfully reduce diagnostic or care disparities without structural interventions.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes need for follow-up funding and equity programs
Progressive95%

Likely to view the resolution positively as raising awareness and highlighting disparities and caregiver burdens.

Would welcome its emphasis on research, early detection, and support services, while noting the lack of concrete funding commitments.

May call for this symbolic action to be followed by targeted federal investments and equity-focused programs.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Would generally support the resolution as a low-cost, bipartisan recognition of a public-health issue.

Appreciates the focus on caregivers, early detection, and disparities, but notes the statement’s lack of concrete policy or budget detail.

Sees it as a potentially useful precursor to measured, evidence-based legislation.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely to view the resolution as a reasonable, ceremonial recognition of a health concern, useful for raising awareness without creating new federal obligations.

May prefer private-sector and state-led solutions, and appreciate that the measure does not authorize spending.

Some conservatives may dismiss it as symbolic but harmless.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a House simple resolution it expresses sentiment and is not a law; therefore it cannot become law by design.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will consider it on the floor
  • Whether a companion Senate resolution might be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes need for follow-up funding and equity programs

As a House simple resolution it expresses sentiment and is not a law; therefore it cannot become law by design.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states the problem, provides supporting statistics and rationale, and articulates specific, high-level enco…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis