H. Res. 1408 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the State of Michigan's contributions to the United States on the occasion of the 250th anniversary of the Union.

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jun 30, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding statement by the House that honors Michigan and its residents on the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. It recognizes Michigan's contributions, encourages citizens to reflect on Founding ideals, and celebrates Michiganders' impact. It does not change federal law or create obligations.

Passage rules

This is a simple House resolution, so it only needs approval in the House and does not go to the Senate or the President. It is a symbolic, nonbinding expression of the House's view.

A non-binding House resolution recognizing the State of Michigan’s contributions to the United States on the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

It notes Michigan’s admission to the Union on January 26, 1837, encourages citizens to reflect on the Founders’ ideals, and celebrates Michiganders’ impact on the nation.

Passage5/100

Nonbinding House resolution unlikely to produce statutory law; adoption in the House is plausible but it does not become law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses appropriate declarative language. It contains the typical minimal structure expected of a symbolic House resolution and does not attempt substantive legal or administrative changes.

Contention12/100

Liberal wants inclusion of marginalized histories and follow-up actions

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsStates

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesFormally honors Michigan’s historical and cultural contributions at the federal level.
  • Potential benefitMay encourage civic reflection and educational programming about the Founders and Michigan history.
  • Local governmentsCould boost local commemorative events and related small-scale tourism activity.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreates no binding policy changes or new funding despite using legislative attention.
  • Potential burdenMay be viewed as a low-priority use of congressional time compared to substantive legislation.
  • StatesCould be perceived as unequal attention compared with other states seeking recognition.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal wants inclusion of marginalized histories and follow-up actions
Progressive90%

Likely supportive of the ceremonial recognition of Michigan and the call for civic reflection.

Would appreciate honoring state contributions but want inclusion of marginalized histories and concrete actions to advance equity.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Would view the resolution as a routine, bipartisan ceremonial measure promoting unity and civic reflection.

Sees low policy risk but would note limited practical impact and prefer inclusivity in wording.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Generally supportive of a patriotic recognition of Michigan and the nation’s founding.

Likely to see the resolution as harmless and appropriate, though possibly unnecessary federal attention to a state honor.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

Nonbinding House resolution unlikely to produce statutory law; adoption in the House is plausible but it does not become law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether committee will schedule the resolution for consideration
  • Any objections to specific language by individual members
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal wants inclusion of marginalized histories and follow-up actions

Nonbinding House resolution unlikely to produce statutory law; adoption in the House is plausible but it does not become law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses appropriate declarative language. It contains the typical minimal structure expected of…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis