H. Res. 1450 (119th)Bill Overview

Condemning all forms of hate.

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jul 22, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a statement by the House condemning all forms of hate and urging support for prevention, victim services, and community resources. It lists concerns about hate incidents and asks for measures like education, training, funding, and federal and state intervention. The text expresses the House's position and priorities but does not create new laws or change legal rights. It does not by itself require the executive branch, courts, or states to take specific actions.

Passage rules

This is a House-only simple resolution that requires approval by a majority of House members; it does not go to the Senate or the President and is non-binding. It states policy preferences and recommendations but does not have the force of law.

This House resolution formally condemns all forms of hate and bigotry, lists recent hate-crime statistics, and urges implementation of comprehensive prevention and response policies.

It supports victim services, culturally and linguistically accessible programs, funding for community organizations, and Federal and State action to combat hate.

Passage0/100

A House simple resolution is non‑binding and cannot become law as written; it can only express the House's sentiment.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly articulated, conventional House resolution that condemns various forms of hate and expresses support for broad, non‑binding measures to prevent and respond to hate. It uses data in the preamble to define the problem but intentionally avoids creating legal obligations or specific programs.

Contention35/100

Liberals emphasize resource allocation and equity-focused implementation

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · CommunitiesFederal agencies · Communities

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesSignals federal commitment encouraging states to adopt prevention and response policies.
  • CommunitiesCould prompt increased funding for victim services and community organizations if Congress appropriates resources.
  • Potential benefitEncourages education and training programs, potentially creating public-safety and social-services positions.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAs a non-binding resolution, it may create expectations of funding without dedicated appropriations.
  • Federal agenciesCould prompt federal-state tensions over policing, hate-crime reporting standards, and immigration policy enforcement.
  • CommunitiesGrant and program requirements could increase administrative and compliance burdens on community organizations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize resource allocation and equity-focused implementation
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive: affirms inclusive values and directs attention and resources to vulnerable communities.

Views the resolution as a necessary moral and policy statement against rising hate incidents.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but pragmatic concerns about vagueness and costs.

Supports the condemnation and victim supports, while wanting clearer implementation, funding sources, and measurable outcomes.

Leans supportive
Conservative45%

Mixed reaction: supports condemnation of hate but wary of provisions seen as encouraging federal intervention, funding for undocumented communities, and potential regulatory overreach.

Some may view it as symbolic or politically one-sided.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

A House simple resolution is non‑binding and cannot become law as written; it can only express the House's sentiment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a companion or consequential statutory bill will be filed
  • Potential floor opposition over phrasing about federal intervention
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize resource allocation and equity-focused implementation

A House simple resolution is non‑binding and cannot become law as written; it can only express the House's sentiment.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly articulated, conventional House resolution that condemns various forms of hate and expresses support for broad, non‑binding measures to prevent and respo…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis