Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker…
This resolution expresses the House of Representatives support for designating the third Friday in March as National FIRST Robotics Day and encourages states, schools, and educators to observe it. It recognizes the role of robotics and STEM education, highlights relevant federal education programs, and urges use of existing afterschool funding to support robotics activities. The measure is a nonbinding statement of support and does not create new law or authorize federal spending. It asks communities and schools to hold activities that teach students about robotics and encourage STEM careers.
This House resolution expresses support for designating the third Friday of every March as "National FIRST Robotics Day." It recognizes robotics and NSF STEM education programs, encourages states and local education agencies to fund afterschool robotics using ESSA Title IV‑A funds, and urges schools to observe the day with robotics-related activities.
Content is ceremonial, low cost, broadly popular STEM promotion; historically such designations clear their chamber(s) with little opposition.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses appropriately nonbinding language to encourage observance and use of existing educational funding; it does not create obligations, appropriate for this form of legislation.
Liberals emphasize equity and funded access for underserved students
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize equity and funded access for underserved students
Likely strongly supportive: the resolution emphasizes STEM education, workforce development, and increasing diversity and inclusion.
It aligns with priorities to expand hands‑on STEM access and pathways that do not require a four‑year degree.
Generally supportive but pragmatic: views the resolution as a nonbinding, low‑cost endorsement of STEM and workforce goals.
Sees value in promoting robotics while seeking clarity on fiscal and implementation implications.
Cautiously favorable: supports workforce and robotics promotion but wary of federal encouragement to reallocate education funds.
Prefers local control and limited federal influence over curricula and spending.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is ceremonial, low cost, broadly popular STEM promotion; historically such designations clear their chamber(s) with little opposition.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize equity and funded access for underserved students
Content is ceremonial, low cost, broadly popular STEM promotion; historically such designations clear their chamber(s) with little oppositi…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses appropriately nonbinding language to encourage observance and use of existing e…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.