H. Res. 1475 (119th)Bill Overview

Support National Community Health Center Week

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Aug 3, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding statement from the House expressing support for designating the first week of August as National Community Health Center Week and encouraging Americans to visit their local community health centers. It highlights the role, services, and economic impact of community health centers and honors their staff, boards, and patients. It does not create a new law, change federal programs, or require anyone to take action; it simply records the House's view and encouragement. As a simple resolution, it reflects only the position of the House of Representatives.

This House resolution expresses support for designating the first week of August as "National Community Health Center Week" and encourages Americans to visit and celebrate local community health centers.

The text highlights factual background about community health centers’ size, services, economic impact, and patient outcomes.

It is a non‑binding, symbolic recognition rather than a funding or regulatory measure.

Passage2/100

H.Res. is a nonbinding House statement that does not become law; symbolic recognition is likely to pass the House but not create statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative House resolution: it articulates a clear purpose, provides supporting rationale, and expresses the House's support for an annual designation without creating legal obligations or mechanisms.

Contention15/100

Progressives emphasize funding and systemic fixes needed

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Communities · Local governmentsCities

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • CommunitiesIncreases public awareness of community health centers and their services, potentially boosting patient engagement.
  • Local governmentsRecognizes and validates community health centers, strengthening advocacy and local support efforts.
  • Local governmentsHighlights CHCs' reported economic and workforce contributions, supporting local job retention and recruitment narrativ…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenPurely symbolic resolution that does not provide funding or change legal authorities for health centers.
  • CitiesMay divert attention from substantive policy reforms needed for CHC financing and capacity constraints.
  • Potential burdenCould create public expectations for expanded services without accompanying resources or implementation plans.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize funding and systemic fixes needed
Progressive90%

Generally very favorable to recognizing community health centers as vital to access and equity.

Views the resolution as a helpful symbolic spotlight but insufficient without parallel funding and policy changes.

Sees opportunity to push for stronger investments and protections for underserved populations.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Supportive of the resolution as a low‑cost, bipartisan way to recognize primary care providers.

Sees concrete public awareness benefits but notes the measure is symbolic and should not substitute for policy or budgetary decisions.

Wants follow-up with measurable outcomes if further action is proposed.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Likely to accept the resolution as a harmless, local‑provider recognition, but some conservatives may be wary of implied federal endorsement.

Prefers emphasis on local control, private sector solutions, and fiscal restraint.

Would watch for any follow-on proposals that increase federal spending or mandate services contrary to local values.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood2/100

H.Res. is a nonbinding House statement that does not become law; symbolic recognition is likely to pass the House but not create statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether committee will schedule the resolution for consideration
  • Potential procedural objections during floor consideration
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize funding and systemic fixes needed

H.Res. is a nonbinding House statement that does not become law; symbolic recognition is likely to pass the House but not create statutory…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative House resolution: it articulates a clear purpose, provides supporting rationale, and expresses the House's support for an…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis