Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This resolution is the House formally accusing President Donald J. Trump of "high crimes and misdemeanors" and adopting articles of impeachment against him. If the House votes to adopt these articles, they would be sent to the Senate for a trial to decide whether to convict and remove him from office. The resolution itself does not remove the President, does not create criminal penalties, and does not become law.
The House may impeach by a simple majority vote; after adoption, the Senate holds a trial and would need a two-thirds vote to convict and remove the President. Impeachment resolutions are a congressional power and do not require the President's signature.
This House resolution articles of impeachment charges President Donald J.
Trump with high crimes and misdemeanors for allegedly abusing presidential power and failing to uphold his oath.
The text centers on claims that the Trump administration militarized and enabled ICE and CBP to operate as unaccountable forces, including multiple alleged unjustified killings, coverups, and obstruction of state and local investigations.
Even if the House impeaches, removal requires a large Senate supermajority; the bill is broad, partisan, and rests on contested factual claims.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a substantively focused impeachment instrument that provides extensive factual allegations and a clear constitutional basis for impeachment while employing the standard operative mechanism (impeachment and exhibition of articles to the Senate).
Progressives emphasize civil-rights accountability; conservatives emphasize partisan misuse.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights accountability; conservatives emphasize partisan misuse.
Likely strongly supportive because the resolution frames systemic abuses, deaths, and coverups as breaches of the presidential oath.
It emphasizes accountability, protection of civil liberties, and using impeachment as a constitutional remedy for threats to democracy and marginalized communities.
Supporters will view the named incidents and administration statements as credible grounds for political removal.
Mixed and cautious: values accountability and rule-of-law but worries about political timing, evidentiary clarity, and institutional strain.
Would support impeachment only with a clear, well-documented factual record and bipartisan consensus about constitutional breaches.
Concerned about producing reforms alongside any political action.
Likely strongly opposed, viewing the resolution as a partisan weapon undermining the presidency and immigration enforcement.
Conservatives will emphasize support for law enforcement, the need for deference to executive discretion on immigration and national security, and worry about chilling enforcement and morale.
They will dispute factual claims and portray impeachment as politically motivated.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Even if the House impeaches, removal requires a large Senate supermajority; the bill is broad, partisan, and rests on contested factual claims.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights accountability; conservatives emphasize partisan misuse.
Even if the House impeaches, removal requires a large Senate supermajority; the bill is broad, partisan, and rests on contested factual cla…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a substantively focused impeachment instrument that provides extensive factual allegations and a clear constitutional basis for impeachment while employing t…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.