H. Res. 1501 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the 80th anniversary of the Fulbright Program.

Simple Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Aug 31, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a House simple resolution that formally recognizes the 80th anniversary of the Fulbright Program and highlights its accomplishments. It expresses the House's support for the program, encourages Congress to back Fulbright and similar educational and cultural programs, congratulates past recipients, and urges global engagement. The resolution does not create law, change funding, or impose obligations; it is non-binding and applies only to the House that adopts it.

Passage rules

Simple resolutions are considered only in the chamber that introduces them and do not go to the President or become law. Passage typically requires a majority vote in the House and does not create binding legal obligations.

This House resolution recognizes the 80th anniversary of the Fulbright Program, recounting its history, scale, and notable alumni.

It encourages Congress to support Fulbright and related educational and cultural programs as tools of U.S. foreign policy and national security, congratulates past and present recipients, and urges global participation in exchanges.

Passage0/100

House simple resolutions are nonbinding and do not become law; content is uncontroversial and likely to be adopted in the House but not enacted as statute.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly identifies and celebrates the 80th anniversary of the Fulbright Program, provides contextual factual material, and issues non-binding encouragements and congratulations without creating legal obligations.

Contention15/100

Left emphasizes expansion and equity; right emphasizes fiscal restraint and vetting

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
StatesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public and congressional awareness about Fulbright's diplomatic and educational value.
  • Potential benefitMay strengthen political support for continued or increased funding of exchange programs.
  • StatesHighlights soft power benefits, potentially enhancing international goodwill toward the United States.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs purely symbolic and does not mandate funding or programmatic changes.
  • Federal agenciesCould be used to justify reallocating federal funds toward international programs over domestic needs.
  • Potential burdenMay draw criticism about selection fairness and unequal access for lower-income applicants.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes expansion and equity; right emphasizes fiscal restraint and vetting
Progressive95%

Overall supportive and pleased; views the resolution as a positive reaffirmation of public diplomacy and international educational exchange.

Sees Fulbright as advancing mutual understanding, promoting diverse voices, and strengthening people-to-people ties central to progressive foreign-policy goals.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Favorable but pragmatic.

Views the resolution as a bipartisan, low‑risk recognition of an established diplomatic tool, while wanting assurances about program effectiveness, oversight, and fiscal responsibility.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Generally supportive of recognizing a longstanding program that advances U.S. interests abroad, but cautious about cost, ideological content, and security screening.

Likely to back the resolution while urging fiscal prudence and accountability.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

House simple resolutions are nonbinding and do not become law; content is uncontroversial and likely to be adopted in the House but not enacted as statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House committee will schedule consideration
  • If a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes expansion and equity; right emphasizes fiscal restraint and vetting

House simple resolutions are nonbinding and do not become law; content is uncontroversial and likely to be adopted in the House but not ena…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly identifies and celebrates the 80th anniversary of the Fulbright Program, provides contextual factual…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis