H. Res. 289 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing support for the designation of April 2025 as "Second Chance Month".

Crime and Law Enforcement|Crime and Law Enforcement
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 1, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

A non‑binding House resolution expressing support for designating April 2025 as "Second Chance Month." It highlights collateral consequences faced by people with criminal records, cites reentry laws and programs (Second Chance Act, First Step Act), honors community and organizational reentry efforts, and calls for public awareness and actions to reduce unnecessary legal and social barriers to successful reentry.

Passage0/100

This is a nonbinding House resolution/ceremonial designation; it does not create law and therefore cannot become statute as written.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and provides the customary, limited mechanisms appropriate to an expression of support and designation of a month.

Contention18/100

Liberals press for concrete reforms and funding beyond symbolism

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Employers · Federal agenciesTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersRaises national awareness about collateral consequences and barriers to reentry for formerly incarcerated people.
  • EmployersEncourages employers and communities to consider hiring and supporting individuals with criminal records.
  • Federal agenciesAffirms support for federal reentry programs such as the Second Chance Act and First Step Act.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates only a symbolic, nonbinding designation without changing statutes or providing funding.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould raise public safety concerns among people favoring stricter post-conviction restrictions.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay generate expectations for program funding or legal changes that the resolution does not authorize.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals press for concrete reforms and funding beyond symbolism
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive.

Views the resolution as a positive symbolic step recognizing redemption, racial disparities, and barriers to employment, housing, and education for people with criminal records.

Sees it as reinforcing momentum for deeper reforms.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally favorable.

Views the resolution as a low‑cost, consensus symbolic gesture that highlights effective reentry programs while acknowledging public safety concerns.

Wants measurable, evidence‑based follow‑through rather than only rhetoric.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Modestly supportive but cautious.

May back rehabilitation and lowering barriers for reformed individuals, while stressing accountability, public safety, and employer choice.

Prefers voluntary, community-based approaches over federal mandates.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a nonbinding House resolution/ceremonial designation; it does not create law and therefore cannot become statute as written.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule floor consideration
  • If the Senate will introduce a companion or similar resolution
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals press for concrete reforms and funding beyond symbolism

This is a nonbinding House resolution/ceremonial designation; it does not create law and therefore cannot become statute as written.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and provides the customary, limited mechanisms appropriate to an expression of support a…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis