H. Res. 370 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting May 2 as "National Space Day" in recognition of the significant positive impact the aerospace community has and will continue to have on the United States of America.

Science, Technology, Communications|Science, Technology, Communications
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
May 1, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution designates May 2 as “National Space Day” and expresses congressional support for that observance.

It recognizes contributions from NASA, the Armed Forces, commercial aerospace, research centers, and educational partners, and highlights benefits like STEM engagement and technological spin-offs.

The resolution is symbolic and nonbinding, aimed at honoring the aerospace community and promoting space-related education and partnerships.

Passage5/100

As a non‑binding House resolution, it is likely to pass the House but does not create law; becoming a binding statute is unlikely absent separate legislation.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses appropriate, concise operative language to express support and recognition without attempting substantive legal change.

Contention12/100

Progressives worry about military-commercial nexus and equity in STEM.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Students · Local governmentsTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases public awareness of the aerospace sector and its scientific and economic contributions.
  • StudentsEncourages STEM outreach that could boost student interest and recruitment into related careers.
  • Local governmentsProvides symbolic federal recognition municipalities and organizations can use to plan events and tourism.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersIs purely symbolic and does not provide funding, regulatory changes, or program authority.
  • Targeted stakeholdersDiverts limited congressional time to a commemorative resolution instead of substantive policy measures.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay be seen as endorsing industry interests without addressing environmental or regulatory space activity impacts.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives worry about military-commercial nexus and equity in STEM.
Progressive80%

Generally supportive of recognizing science and STEM outreach, but cautious about celebrating commercial and military space roles without accountability.

Would welcome emphasis on public benefits and inclusive STEM access; may critique corporate influence or militarization of space.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Likely supportive because the resolution is symbolic, bipartisan, and low-cost.

Views it as a reasonable way to honor industry, military, and scientific partnerships while encouraging STEM careers.

May want clarity that it creates no new mandates or spending.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Generally favorable because it honors defense, industry, and national leadership in space.

Appreciates mention of the Armed Forces and commercial partnerships.

May still be wary of federal overreach or additional spending tied to the observance.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

As a non‑binding House resolution, it is likely to pass the House but does not create law; becoming a binding statute is unlikely absent separate legislation.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether sponsors seek a companion Senate resolution
  • Committee scheduling and prioritization
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives worry about military-commercial nexus and equity in STEM.

As a non‑binding House resolution, it is likely to pass the House but does not create law; becoming a binding statute is unlikely absent se…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses appropriate, concise operative language to express support and recognitio…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis