- Local governmentsProvides national publicity and marketing value to Korson’s Tree Farms and Michigan’s Christmas tree industry, which co…
- StatesSymbolically recognizes and may strengthen advocacy for the agricultural sector by highlighting the industry’s economic…
- Federal agenciesHas no direct regulatory or budgetary effect and does not create new federal requirements, obligations, or spending.
Congratulating Korson's Tree Farms in Montcalm County in Sidney Township for being selected to provide the 2025 White House Christmas Tree.
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
This House resolution congratulates Korson’s Tree Farms of Montcalm County, Michigan, for being selected to provide the 2025 White House Christmas Tree after winning the National Christmas Tree Association contest.
It notes the farm’s contest history and Michigan’s broader Christmas-tree industry statistics, recognizes the agricultural and economic importance of the industry, invites the farm to the U.S. Capitol to be honored, and directs the Clerk to provide enrolled copies of the resolution to President Donald J.
Trump and First Lady Melania Trump.
This is a nonbinding House resolution (H. Res.) that expresses congratulations and makes routine administrative invitations; such resolutions do not create law and are not enrolled as statutes. Based on content alone, there is effectively no pathway for this text to become law without converting it into a different legislative vehicle.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, supplies appropriate and specific ceremonial actions, and imposes minimal administrative direction consistent with its scope.
All three personas broadly support the resolution, but the progressive is slightly more likely to note procedural opportunity costs and wish for substantive agricultural support.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersAs a ceremonial resolution, critics may argue it uses congressional time and attention for symbolic recognition rather…
- CitiesCould be viewed as giving preferential publicity to a single private business or region, raising questions about the ap…
- Targeted stakeholdersEnvironmental critics may object that celebrating the cut-tree industry emphasizes harvest of cut evergreens rather tha…
Why the argument around this bill splits.
All three personas broadly support the resolution, but the progressive is slightly more likely to note procedural opportunity costs and wish for substantive agricultural support.
A liberal-leaning observer would view this resolution as a routine, symbolic congratulatory measure that primarily honors a small business and a state agricultural sector.
They would likely consider it overall benign but might question whether floor or committee time could be used for more substantive matters.
They may appreciate recognition of local agriculture and rural jobs but could note the explicit naming of President Trump and the First Lady as a mild partisan element, though not a policy concern.
A centrist would treat this as a low-stakes, customary resolution honoring a local producer whose tree was selected for a ceremonial national display.
They would view it as an appropriate way to celebrate local industry and constituent achievement, while noting it has no regulatory or budgetary effect.
They might have a minor practical concern about use of floor or committee time for ceremonial matters but would generally see it as unobjectionable and useful for constituent relations.
A mainstream conservative would view the resolution positively as a small-government, apolitical recognition of private-sector success and American agriculture.
They would likely appreciate the praise for a family-owned farm and the celebration of domestic production, and would favor the symbolic connection to the President and First Lady.
Because the resolution is non-regulatory and carries no spending commitments, it aligns with conservative preference for limited government action.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
This is a nonbinding House resolution (H. Res.) that expresses congratulations and makes routine administrative invitations; such resolutions do not create law and are not enrolled as statutes. Based on content alone, there is effectively no pathway for this text to become law without converting it into a different legislative vehicle.
- Whether the resolution will be brought to the House floor for consideration (though historically similar ceremonial resolutions are typically considered by unanimous consent).
- Whether any Members object to procedural scheduling or to the specific instruction to provide copies to the named President and First Lady, which could marginally affect floor action though such objections are rare.
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
All three personas broadly support the resolution, but the progressive is slightly more likely to note procedural opportunity costs and wis…
This is a nonbinding House resolution (H. Res.) that expresses congratulations and makes routine administrative invitations; such resolutio…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, supplies appropriate and specific ceremonial actions, and imposes minimal administrativ…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.