- Federal agenciesCreates nationwide uniform vehicle emissions standards under federal authority, reducing state-by-state regulatory vari…
- ManufacturersReduces compliance and certification costs for manufacturers by avoiding multiple different state standards.
- StatesSimplifies fuel production and distribution logistics by eliminating state-specific gasoline and fuel regulatory differ…
Stop CARB Act of 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
This bill amends the Clean Air Act to eliminate the Section 209 waiver that lets California set motor vehicle emissions standards and to repeal Section 177 that allows other States to adopt California standards.
It voids existing and pending waivers, prohibits States from adopting standards for certain nonroad engines and vehicles, and makes conforming statutory repeals and amendments tied to those program authorities.
Highly controversial federal preemption of state environmental authority with little compromise and strong litigation risk lowers chances substantially.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly targeted substantive statutory rewrite executed through precise amendments to the Clean Air Act. It provides concrete, citation-level changes that would immediately alter federal-state regulatory authority on vehicle and nonroad emissions.
Environmental outcomes: liberals see rollbacks; conservatives downplay reductions
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Local governmentsEliminates California's waiver authority, reducing states' flexibility to adopt stricter local emissions measures.
- Targeted stakeholdersMay slow adoption of stricter vehicle and zero-emission mandates, potentially increasing greenhouse gas emissions.
- Local governmentsCould worsen local air quality and associated public health outcomes where stronger standards would have applied.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Environmental outcomes: liberals see rollbacks; conservatives downplay reductions
Likely strongly opposed.
Views the bill as a federal rollback of state authority to set stricter vehicle and nonroad emissions rules, undermining climate, air quality, and public health protections.
Mixed view.
Appreciates regulatory uniformity and reduced interstate complexity but worries about environmental backsliding and the consequences of retroactive waiver voiding.
Likely supportive.
Sees the bill as preventing California from imposing stricter standards on other states and reducing regulatory burdens on manufacturers and interstate commerce.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Highly controversial federal preemption of state environmental authority with little compromise and strong litigation risk lowers chances substantially.
- Actual preferences of major auto manufacturers and industry trade groups
- Potential for rapid, high-profile litigation if enacted
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Environmental outcomes: liberals see rollbacks; conservatives downplay reductions
Highly controversial federal preemption of state environmental authority with little compromise and strong litigation risk lowers chances s…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly targeted substantive statutory rewrite executed through precise amendments to the Clean Air Act. It provides concrete, citation-level changes that would…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.