Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S2141-2142: 2)
Creates an Office of Security Training and Counterintelligence within the Executive Office of the President.
Establishes a Senate-confirmed Director (Top Secret/TS-SCI eligible), requires staffing largely by detailees from federal agencies, and assigns responsibilities for security training, counterintelligence/insider-threat activities, and protection of classified and sensitive information.
Creates a four-member bipartisan Security Training and Counterintelligence Advisory Board with TS/SCI‑eligible experts, two-year terms, an elected chair who cannot be a current/former EOP employee, and annual reports to congressional intelligence committees.
A modest, administratively focused bill with bipartisan features and limited fiscal impact; moderate chance but subject to confirmation and oversight scrutiny.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes an administrative office within the Executive Office of the President and specifies key governance features (Senate-confirmed Director, qualifications, detailee staffing, and an advisory board with reporting). It provides modest implementation mechanisms but omits funding authority, comprehensive operational authorities, and robust accountability and evaluation provisions.
Progressives emphasize civil‑liberties and whistleblower safeguards.
Progressives emphasize civil‑liberties and whistleblower safeguards.
Likely supportive of improved protections for classified information and stronger insider‑threat training, while wary of potential civil‑liberties and whistleblower impacts.
Would press for explicit privacy safeguards, whistleblower protections, and transparency around monitoring practices.
Generally favorable to improving operational security and counterintelligence in the EOP, valuing the bipartisan advisory board and Senate confirmation.
Wants clarity on funding, authorities, oversight, and measures to avoid duplication with existing agencies.
Supports stronger counterintelligence and leak prevention inside the EOP, but skeptical of adding bureaucracy and potential partisan uses.
Wants strict limits, clear congressional oversight, and safeguards against weaponizing security authorities.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
A modest, administratively focused bill with bipartisan features and limited fiscal impact; moderate chance but subject to confirmation and oversight scrutiny.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize civil‑liberties and whistleblower safeguards.
A modest, administratively focused bill with bipartisan features and limited fiscal impact; moderate chance but subject to confirmation and…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes an administrative office within the Executive Office of the President and specifies key governance features (Senate-confirmed Director, qualificat…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.