Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Directs HUD’s Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research to publish federal guidelines and best practices for State and local zoning frameworks to increase housing supply.
Requires a two-year public comment and task force process, prescribes recommended zoning reforms (e.g., by-right duplexes, fewer parking minimums, ADUs, transit‑oriented development), establishes reporting to Congress on adoption and permit impacts, abolishes the Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse, and authorizes $3 million annually for FY2026–2030 to implement the Act.
Technocratic, low-cost guidance with stakeholder input improves prospects, but federalism concerns and local pushback create meaningful obstacles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-defined study/reporting measure that prescribes the production of federal guidelines and best practices on State and local zoning frameworks. It names the responsible official, sets timelines, enumerates task force composition, lists substantive topics for inclusion, requires public comment, authorizes specific funding, abolishes an existing clearinghouse, and requires a follow-up report to Congress.
Federal guidance versus local home‑rule and municipal control.
Federal guidance versus local home‑rule and municipal control.
Generally favorable.
Views the bill as a constructive federal role in addressing zoning-related housing shortages and promoting equitable, anti-displacement measures.
Will watch for strong protections for extremely low-income households and enforcement mechanisms.
Cautiously supportive.
Sees value in technical guidance, standardized best practices, and stakeholder input to reduce permitting delays.
Wants safeguards on federalism, measurable outcomes, and attention to costs and community fit.
Skeptical to opposed.
Views this as federal pressure on local land use and zoning, potentially undermining municipal authority and property preferences.
Supports increased supply but dislikes top-down guidance and appeals processes that may bypass local control.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic, low-cost guidance with stakeholder input improves prospects, but federalism concerns and local pushback create meaningful obstacles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Federal guidance versus local home‑rule and municipal control.
Technocratic, low-cost guidance with stakeholder input improves prospects, but federalism concerns and local pushback create meaningful obs…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-defined study/reporting measure that prescribes the production of federal guidelines and best practices on State and local zoning frameworks. It names the r…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.