S. 1337 (119th)Bill Overview

Cybersecurity Information Sharing Extension Act

Science, Technology, Communications|Science, Technology, Communications
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 8, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill amends section 111(a) of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 (6 U.S.C. 1510(a)) by extending its effective period.

The date currently set to expire in 2025 would be replaced with 2035.

No other changes to statutory text are included in this bill.

Passage70/100

Very narrow, low-cost extension of an existing authority with limited policy change; procedural and privacy objections are the main risks.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, narrowly framed procedural (housekeeping) amendment that replaces the statutory effective date in 6 U.S.C. 1510(a) to extend the period of the underlying cybersecurity information-sharing provision.

Contention48/100

Privacy oversight vs operational continuity: liberals emphasize safeguards; conservatives prioritize continuity

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersMaintains uninterrupted government-private cybersecurity information sharing through 2035.
  • Targeted stakeholdersImproves threat detection by preserving established channels for sharing technical indicators.
  • Targeted stakeholdersReduces compliance uncertainty and administrative burden for companies relying on the program.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersExtends duration of sharing authorities that critics say may increase privacy and personal data exposure.
  • Targeted stakeholdersContinues liability protections that some argue reduce legal accountability for improper data disclosures.
  • Targeted stakeholdersDelays legislative review and reform that could tighten privacy safeguards or oversight mechanisms.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Privacy oversight vs operational continuity: liberals emphasize safeguards; conservatives prioritize continuity
Progressive60%

Cautiously supportive of maintaining public-private cybersecurity information sharing, but concerned about civil liberties and privacy.

Wants stronger transparency, minimization, and oversight provisions before fully endorsing a ten-year extension.

Split reaction
Centrist75%

Pragmatic support if the extension prevents a lapse in operational authorities and is paired with oversight and performance metrics.

Views this as an administrative update but wants measurable accountability.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely favorable because it sustains information-sharing tools that bolster national security and reduce regulatory friction.

Prefers minimal new constraints or federal expansion alongside the extension.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Very narrow, low-cost extension of an existing authority with limited policy change; procedural and privacy objections are the main risks.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether privacy advocates will mount sustained opposition
  • Committee and floor scheduling/prioritization
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Privacy oversight vs operational continuity: liberals emphasize safeguards; conservatives prioritize continuity

Very narrow, low-cost extension of an existing authority with limited policy change; procedural and privacy objections are the main risks.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, narrowly framed procedural (housekeeping) amendment that replaces the statutory effective date in 6 U.S.C. 1510(a) to extend the period of the underlyin…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis