S. 1339 (119th)Bill Overview

Stop CCP Money Laundering Act of 2025

International Affairs|International Affairs
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 8, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill requires the Treasury Secretary, within 180 days, to determine whether Hong Kong should be designated a jurisdiction of primary money laundering concern under 31 U.S.C. 5318A.

It also requires the Secretary of State, coordinating with Treasury and Commerce, to report within 360 days on Hong Kong’s role in facilitating transfers of products, technology, and funds that violate U.S. export controls and sanctions, assess the impact of Hong Kong and PRC national security laws on AML/KYC adherence, and describe cooperation with U.S. authorities.

The bill defines the congressional committees to receive these submissions.

Passage45/100

Low direct cost and procedural focus raise chances, but geopolitical sensitivity and ideological framing reduce support and could slow action.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting and determination measure. It identifies responsible agencies, sets deadlines, defines report recipients, and enumerates substantive elements the report must address, while explicitly linking the Treasury action to existing statutory authority (31 U.S.C. 5318A).

Contention45/100

Liberals emphasize protecting civil society and avoiding harm to residents.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersIdentifies whether Hong Kong meets the legal standard for primary money laundering concern, enabling targeted U.S. meas…
  • Federal agenciesProvides interagency analysis to improve U.S. enforcement against sanctions evasion and export control violations.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould pressure Hong Kong banks to strengthen anti-money laundering and know-your-customer controls.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersA negative determination could trigger regulatory sanctions that disrupt banking relationships and cross-border payment…
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreased compliance and reporting requirements could raise costs for U.S. and foreign banks operating in Hong Kong.
  • Targeted stakeholdersThe process risks escalating diplomatic and trade tensions with Hong Kong and the People’s Republic of China.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize protecting civil society and avoiding harm to residents.
Progressive80%

Likely to view the bill as a tool to investigate and tighten enforcement against sanctions- and export-control evasion tied to authoritarian actors.

Supportive of stronger oversight and accountability for financial centers enabling human-rights- or security-related abuses, while cautious about collateral harm to Hong Kong civil society and ordinary residents.

Leans supportive
Centrist55%

Views the bill as a narrowly focused, evidence-gathering step that balances national security with caution about economic fallout.

Supports the requirement for interagency analysis, but wants clear cost-benefit reasoning and mitigation plans before any designation or secondary consequences.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Likely to strongly support the bill as a measured step toward confronting PRC and allied actors that exploit Hong Kong for illicit finance and sanctions evasion.

Sees the mandated determination and report as necessary groundwork for tougher financial measures if warranted.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Low direct cost and procedural focus raise chances, but geopolitical sensitivity and ideological framing reduce support and could slow action.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Interagency disagreements on determination outcome
  • Availability of reliable evidence from Hong Kong
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize protecting civil society and avoiding harm to residents.

Low direct cost and procedural focus raise chances, but geopolitical sensitivity and ideological framing reduce support and could slow acti…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting and determination measure. It identifies responsible agencies, sets deadlines, defines report recipients, and enumerates substantive ele…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis