S. 1350 (119th)Bill Overview

A bill to modify the boundaries of the Talladega National Forest, and for other purposes.

Public Lands and Natural Resources|AlabamaForests, forestry, trees
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 8, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 210.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill modifies the boundaries of Talladega National Forest by adding the area shown on a September 6, 2024 map, makes that map publicly available in Forest Service offices, and authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to acquire land and interests within the new boundary using Weeks Act authorities.

Acquisitions must be from willing sellers by donation, exchange, or purchase using donated or appropriated funds, and lands acquired will be managed under existing National Forest System laws and regulations.

Passage75/100

Technocratic, limited-scope bill using established authorities with compromise features; typically clears Congress unless unexpected local opposition or funding issues arise.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, legally grounded boundary-modification measure that specifies the map, cites existing statutory acquisition authority, and sets basic acquisition constraints. It effectively connects the change to existing National Forest law and names the responsible official.

Contention60/100

Liberal emphasizes conservation and public access benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsLocal governments · Federal agencies
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesBrings additional land under federal conservation management, aiding habitat and biodiversity protection.
  • Targeted stakeholdersImproves watershed protection and could yield water quality benefits for downstream communities.
  • Local governmentsExpands public recreation access, potentially increasing tourism and related local service jobs.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsConverting privately taxed land to federal ownership could reduce the local property tax base.
  • Local governmentsExpanded federal ownership may limit local economic development and extractive industry opportunities.
  • Federal agenciesAcquisitions and subsequent management will likely require federal appropriations and ongoing funding commitments.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes conservation and public access benefits
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive: expands public lands and conservation tools under existing law.

Views the willing-seller requirement as protection of property rights while enabling habitat, watershed, and recreation protections.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: accepts boundary change under longstanding legal authorities, but wants clarity on costs, scale, and local impacts.

Supports willing-seller approach and existing management rules while seeking fiscal and procedural safeguards.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Skeptical: views expansion of national forest boundaries as increased federal control and possible long-term restrictions.

The willing-seller requirement reduces some concerns, but the bill's open-ended acquisition authority and management under federal law prompt opposition.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood75/100

Technocratic, limited-scope bill using established authorities with compromise features; typically clears Congress unless unexpected local opposition or funding issues arise.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Map specifics and number/ownership of parcels affected
  • Availability of appropriated funds to complete purchases
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes conservation and public access benefits

Technocratic, limited-scope bill using established authorities with compromise features; typically clears Congress unless unexpected local…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, legally grounded boundary-modification measure that specifies the map, cites existing statutory acquisition authority, and sets basic acquisition constr…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis