Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Requires the Treasury to produce an annual report to Congress on portfolio investments by United States persons in the People’s Republic of China, including investments routed through third jurisdictions.
Reports must identify types of U.S. investors (including State pension funds), investors accounting for more than 2% of annual totals, and Chinese entities receiving investments, with sector breakdowns (including housing), sanctioned entities receiving funds, and recipients receiving over $100,000,000.
The first report must cover January 1, 2008 through the report date; subsequent reports cover the prior year.
Low-cost, information-only requirement with bipartisan framing increases prospects, but data access, confidentiality, and executive-branch implementation issues create uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes an annual reporting requirement with specified content elements, thresholds, definitions, responsible official, and timeline. It is functionally adequate as a narrowly scoped reporting mandate but lacks operational, fiscal, and methodological detail needed for reliable execution.
Whether the report should trigger divestment or remain informational
Whether the report should trigger divestment or remain informational
Likely supportive of increased transparency about U.S. capital flowing to China as a tool to expose risks and ethical concerns.
Sees the report as useful for protecting public pension beneficiaries and for aligning investments with human rights and climate goals, while wanting safeguards against misuse.
Generally supportive of transparency and oversight but cautious about operational feasibility and unintended consequences.
Wants clear methodology, limited cost, and protections for sensitive commercial information to avoid harming markets or diplomacy.
Likely supportive as a national-security and economic-sovereignty measure to reveal and ultimately reduce capital flows to China.
May view this as a first step toward stronger restrictions, while wanting the report to be actionable.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-cost, information-only requirement with bipartisan framing increases prospects, but data access, confidentiality, and executive-branch implementation issues create uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Whether the report should trigger divestment or remain informational
Low-cost, information-only requirement with bipartisan framing increases prospects, but data access, confidentiality, and executive-branch…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes an annual reporting requirement with specified content elements, thresholds, definitions, responsible official, and timeline. It is functionally a…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.