S. 1368 (119th)Bill Overview

TSP Fiduciary Security Act of 2025

Government Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 9, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill amends federal law governing the Thrift Savings Fund (TSP) to add a fiduciary duty to prevent TSP investments and related voting from harming U.S. national security.

It requires the Secretary of Labor, in consultation with Defense, Justice, Homeland Security, and Treasury, to issue regulations and standards within one year, creates presumptions about investments in entities on certain China and export-control lists, defines covered votes and covered countries, mandates reviews and annual reports to Congress, temporarily shields fiduciaries from personal liability for that new national-security duty until January 1, 2027, and bars TSP mutual-fund-window funds from investing in entities based in the People’s Republic of China or their subsidiaries.

Passage45/100

Narrow, administratively focused national‑security measure with some bipartisan appeal but realistic opposition from financial stakeholders and potential implementation/legal questions.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive change to fiduciary duties for the Thrift Savings Fund and provides a reasonably detailed statutory framework for regulation, review, and reporting, while deferring important operational specifics to the Secretary of Labor.

Contention55/100

Degree of priority: national-security screening versus maximizing financial returns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesAdds explicit national-security protections for retirement assets of federal employees and service members.
  • Targeted stakeholdersReduces direct exposure of TSP assets to entities on U.S. national-security and export-control lists.
  • Federal agenciesRequires clear regulatory standards and interagency consultation to guide fiduciaries on security risks.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersNarrowing the investable universe could reduce diversification and potentially lower long-term participant returns.
  • Targeted stakeholdersImplementing reviews, reporting, and new compliance standards will increase administrative and regulatory costs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersPresumptions about entities and broad covered-country lists could create legal uncertainty and prompt litigation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Degree of priority: national-security screening versus maximizing financial returns
Progressive60%

Likely cautiously supportive of protecting retirement funds tied to national security, but wary of politicizing investment decisions and potential harms to returns.

Concerned about vague standards, temporary liability shield, and possible negative effects on diversification and human-rights or climate considerations.

Split reaction
Centrist70%

Sees a reasonable case for incorporating national-security safeguards into TSP fiduciary duties, but wants clearer implementation, cost estimates, and legal defensibility.

Likely to support if rules are specific, transparent, and minimize harm to returns.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Generally supportive: strengthens national-security protections, restricts PRC investments, and increases oversight of TSP voting.

May prefer even stronger or permanent liability protections and broader bans on adversary-country investment exposure.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Narrow, administratively focused national‑security measure with some bipartisan appeal but realistic opposition from financial stakeholders and potential implementation/legal questions.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Absent cost estimate or agency implementation capacity
  • Legal risk around fiduciary duty interpretation and potential litigation
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Degree of priority: national-security screening versus maximizing financial returns

Narrow, administratively focused national‑security measure with some bipartisan appeal but realistic opposition from financial stakeholders…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive change to fiduciary duties for the Thrift Savings Fund and provides a reasonably detailed statutory framework for regulation, review,…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis