S. 1395 (119th)Bill Overview

NO TIME TO Waste Act);

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and Food
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 9, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

Creates an Office of Food Loss and Waste within USDA to coordinate research, data collection, grants, regional coordinators, and public education.

Authorizes multiple grant programs and block grants to states and tribes for food recovery infrastructure, public-private partnerships, and data projects.

Requires interagency collaboration with EPA and FDA, amends Federal Food Donation Act to require contractor reporting, prioritizes USDA research on food loss, and funds a national education campaign.

Passage38/100

Narrow, technical, low-cost measures with broad appeal raise probability, but the bill's modest profile and competing priorities limit near-term prospects.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill primarily establishes new substantive authorities and programs to reduce food loss and food waste and does so with a mix of specific programmatic provisions and some open-ended implementation discretion.

Contention65/100

Scope and size of federal role versus local and private control

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Local governments · ConsumersFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Local governmentsIncreased funding for infrastructure could expand food recovery capacity and related local jobs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersImproved data and measurement may enable better targeting of policies and quantify emissions reductions.
  • ConsumersA national education campaign could reduce household food waste and improve consumer food-safety knowledge.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersAuthorized funding levels are modest and may be insufficient to meet a nationwide 50 percent reduction goal.
  • Federal agenciesNew reporting requirements for federal contractors and agencies will increase administrative compliance costs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMatching requirements for grants may disadvantage smaller, rural, or low-resource governments and organizations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Scope and size of federal role versus local and private control
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive; aligns with environmental, food security, and equity goals.

Appreciates focus on research, recovery infrastructure, education, and priority support for underserved communities.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but pragmatic; values data-driven, interagency coordination and pilot testing.

Wants clarity on costs, administrative burdens, and evidence of effectiveness before expansion.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Skeptical of federal expansion, new bureaucracy, and added requirements on contractors.

Concerned about mandates, spending, and regulatory burdens on private sector and small governments.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood38/100

Narrow, technical, low-cost measures with broad appeal raise probability, but the bill's modest profile and competing priorities limit near-term prospects.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No formal Congressional Budget Office cost estimate included in text
  • Potential administrative burden on federal contractors and industry feedback
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Scope and size of federal role versus local and private control

Narrow, technical, low-cost measures with broad appeal raise probability, but the bill's modest profile and competing priorities limit near…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill primarily establishes new substantive authorities and programs to reduce food loss and food waste and does so with a mix of specific programmatic provisions and some…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis