- Local governmentsIncreased funding for infrastructure could expand food recovery capacity and related local jobs.
- Targeted stakeholdersImproved data and measurement may enable better targeting of policies and quantify emissions reductions.
- ConsumersA national education campaign could reduce household food waste and improve consumer food-safety knowledge.
NO TIME TO Waste Act);
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Creates an Office of Food Loss and Waste within USDA to coordinate research, data collection, grants, regional coordinators, and public education.
Authorizes multiple grant programs and block grants to states and tribes for food recovery infrastructure, public-private partnerships, and data projects.
Requires interagency collaboration with EPA and FDA, amends Federal Food Donation Act to require contractor reporting, prioritizes USDA research on food loss, and funds a national education campaign.
Narrow, technical, low-cost measures with broad appeal raise probability, but the bill's modest profile and competing priorities limit near-term prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill primarily establishes new substantive authorities and programs to reduce food loss and food waste and does so with a mix of specific programmatic provisions and some open-ended implementation discretion.
Scope and size of federal role versus local and private control
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersAuthorized funding levels are modest and may be insufficient to meet a nationwide 50 percent reduction goal.
- Federal agenciesNew reporting requirements for federal contractors and agencies will increase administrative compliance costs.
- Targeted stakeholdersMatching requirements for grants may disadvantage smaller, rural, or low-resource governments and organizations.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Scope and size of federal role versus local and private control
Likely broadly supportive; aligns with environmental, food security, and equity goals.
Appreciates focus on research, recovery infrastructure, education, and priority support for underserved communities.
Generally favorable but pragmatic; values data-driven, interagency coordination and pilot testing.
Wants clarity on costs, administrative burdens, and evidence of effectiveness before expansion.
Skeptical of federal expansion, new bureaucracy, and added requirements on contractors.
Concerned about mandates, spending, and regulatory burdens on private sector and small governments.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, technical, low-cost measures with broad appeal raise probability, but the bill's modest profile and competing priorities limit near-term prospects.
- No formal Congressional Budget Office cost estimate included in text
- Potential administrative burden on federal contractors and industry feedback
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Scope and size of federal role versus local and private control
Narrow, technical, low-cost measures with broad appeal raise probability, but the bill's modest profile and competing priorities limit near…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill primarily establishes new substantive authorities and programs to reduce food loss and food waste and does so with a mix of specific programmatic provisions and some…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.