S. 1760 (119th)Bill Overview

Restoring WIFIA Eligibility Act of 2025

Economics and Public Finance|Economics and Public Finance
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
May 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill amends the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 to change how certain WIFIA financial assistance is treated for budget scoring.

If the borrower is a non‑Federal eligible entity and repayments come from non‑Federal revenue, that assistance is "deemed non‑Federal" for Federal Credit Reform Act purposes.

Those amounts are to be treated as a direct loan or loan guarantee as defined under the Federal Credit Reform Act.

Passage40/100

Narrow, technical change with plausible bipartisan appeal, but hinges on budget politics, scorekeeper views, and whether it is attached to broader legislation.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative/operational amendment that is concise and well‑placed within the existing statutory structure but provides only minimal implementation and oversight detail.

Contention30/100

Liberals stress environmental and equity safeguards.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesClarifies budget scoring, potentially increasing WIFIA loan availability for non‑Federal borrowers.
  • Federal agenciesEncourages leveraging of non‑Federal revenue to attract additional infrastructure investment.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMakes financing terms more predictable, potentially speeding project planning and construction.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesCould obscure federal fiscal exposure by altering how loans are budgeted and reported.
  • Federal agenciesMay weaken transparency in federal scorekeeping and affect PAYGO or deficit calculations.
  • Federal agenciesMight shift financial risk to taxpayers if non‑Federal revenue sources underperform.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals stress environmental and equity safeguards.
Progressive70%

Likely cautiously supportive: sees expanded or restored WIFIA scoring as unlocking water infrastructure financing for communities.

Wants assurances that environmental, equity, and affordability protections remain in place and that taxpayer exposure is transparent.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Views the bill as a technical budgetary fix that could facilitate water projects while changing scoring rules.

Wants CBO cost estimates, clarity about fiscal exposure, and oversight to prevent evasion of budget discipline.

Split reaction
Conservative65%

Likely generally favorable if it reduces up‑front federal outlays and enables state/local financing.

Skeptical if it is a budgetary gimmick that increases implicit federal guarantees without proper appropriation.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Narrow, technical change with plausible bipartisan appeal, but hinges on budget politics, scorekeeper views, and whether it is attached to broader legislation.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • CBO/OMB interpretation and formal scoring response
  • Absence of a public cost estimate in bill text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals stress environmental and equity safeguards.

Narrow, technical change with plausible bipartisan appeal, but hinges on budget politics, scorekeeper views, and whether it is attached to…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative/operational amendment that is concise and well‑placed within the existing statutory structure but provides only minimal implement…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis