S. 269 (119th)Bill Overview

Ending Improper Payments to Deceased People Act

Social Welfare|Disability assistanceIntergovernmental relations
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 28, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Held at the desk.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill amends Section 205(r) of the Social Security Act to improve data sharing between the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Do Not Pay working system, require cooperative agreements covering proportional state death-data costs, and require SSA to use a "clear and convincing" evidence standard before recording a death in records provided under the section.

It also requires SSA to notify any cooperating agency if an individual was incorrectly identified as deceased.

The amendments take effect December 27, 2026.

Passage60/100

Narrow, administrative bill with modest fiscal footprints and compromise features; lacks major opposition drivers but depends on cost and agency cooperation.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention25/100

Evidentiary standard: accuracy vs. speedy fraud prevention

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesStates · Federal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersLikely reduces improper benefit payments made to deceased individuals by improving data sharing.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSupports recovery efforts for improperly paid benefits through Do Not Pay system integration.
  • Federal agenciesPromotes federal–state cost-sharing agreements to fund access to State death data.
Likely burdened
  • StatesImplementation and ongoing integration likely increase administrative costs for SSA, Do Not Pay, and States.
  • Targeted stakeholdersThe clear and convincing evidence standard could delay recording deaths, temporarily increasing improper payments.
  • Federal agenciesExpanded interagency data sharing raises privacy and data-security concerns about death records.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Evidentiary standard: accuracy vs. speedy fraud prevention
Progressive85%

Likely supportive overall because the bill aims to stop improper payments while adding stronger accuracy safeguards to prevent wrongful death records.

It balances anti-waste measures with a higher evidentiary standard and a notification requirement for errors.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: sees improved data sharing and error-notification as efficient anti-waste measures, while being cautious about cost allocation, administrative burden, and potential slowdowns from the new evidentiary standard.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Supportive of better anti-fraud coordination and reducing improper payments, but concerned the "clear and convincing" standard raises the bar and could hamper prompt fraud prevention.

Prefers efficiency and taxpayer protection without procedural obstacles.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Narrow, administrative bill with modest fiscal footprints and compromise features; lacks major opposition drivers but depends on cost and agency cooperation.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or CBO score included in text
  • States' willingness to accept and price death data cost sharing
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Evidentiary standard: accuracy vs. speedy fraud prevention

Narrow, administrative bill with modest fiscal footprints and compromise features; lacks major opposition drivers but depends on cost and a…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Ending Improper Payments to Deceased People Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis