- Targeted stakeholdersLikely reduces improper benefit payments made to deceased individuals by improving data sharing.
- Targeted stakeholdersSupports recovery efforts for improperly paid benefits through Do Not Pay system integration.
- Federal agenciesPromotes federal–state cost-sharing agreements to fund access to State death data.
Ending Improper Payments to Deceased People Act
Held at the desk.
This bill amends Section 205(r) of the Social Security Act to improve data sharing between the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Do Not Pay working system, require cooperative agreements covering proportional state death-data costs, and require SSA to use a "clear and convincing" evidence standard before recording a death in records provided under the section.
It also requires SSA to notify any cooperating agency if an individual was incorrectly identified as deceased.
The amendments take effect December 27, 2026.
Narrow, administrative bill with modest fiscal footprints and compromise features; lacks major opposition drivers but depends on cost and agency cooperation.
How solid the drafting looks.
Evidentiary standard: accuracy vs. speedy fraud prevention
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- StatesImplementation and ongoing integration likely increase administrative costs for SSA, Do Not Pay, and States.
- Targeted stakeholdersThe clear and convincing evidence standard could delay recording deaths, temporarily increasing improper payments.
- Federal agenciesExpanded interagency data sharing raises privacy and data-security concerns about death records.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Evidentiary standard: accuracy vs. speedy fraud prevention
Likely supportive overall because the bill aims to stop improper payments while adding stronger accuracy safeguards to prevent wrongful death records.
It balances anti-waste measures with a higher evidentiary standard and a notification requirement for errors.
Generally favorable but pragmatic: sees improved data sharing and error-notification as efficient anti-waste measures, while being cautious about cost allocation, administrative burden, and potential slowdowns from the new evidentiary standard.
Supportive of better anti-fraud coordination and reducing improper payments, but concerned the "clear and convincing" standard raises the bar and could hamper prompt fraud prevention.
Prefers efficiency and taxpayer protection without procedural obstacles.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, administrative bill with modest fiscal footprints and compromise features; lacks major opposition drivers but depends on cost and agency cooperation.
- No cost estimate or CBO score included in text
- States' willingness to accept and price death data cost sharing
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Evidentiary standard: accuracy vs. speedy fraud prevention
Narrow, administrative bill with modest fiscal footprints and compromise features; lacks major opposition drivers but depends on cost and a…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Ending Improper Payments to Deceased People Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.