Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to execute whatever instruments are necessary to remove all deed restrictions from a specific 3.62-acre parcel at 2956 Park Avenue in Paducah, Kentucky. The restrictions referenced are those in the quitclaim deed from the United States to the City of Paducah dated April 27, 2012.
Progressives stress environmental and public-benefit safeguards.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive change that is clearly stated and identifies the parcel and deed at issue.
The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to execute whatever instruments are necessary to remove all deed restrictions from a specific 3.62-acre parcel at 2956 Park Avenue in Paducah, Kentucky.
The restrictions referenced are those in the quitclaim deed from the United States to the City of Paducah dated April 27, 2012.
The action would eliminate easements, reservations, terms, conditions, and covenants recorded with that deed.
Very narrow, low-cost, administrative land-title removal generally enjoys bipartisan, low-resistance support.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive change that is clearly stated and identifies the parcel and deed at issue. It provides a simple, administrable directive to the Secretary of the Interior but lacks several practical implementation and accountability details.
Progressives stress environmental and public-benefit safeguards.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives stress environmental and public-benefit safeguards.
Likely cautiously favorable if removal enables community-driven public uses or affordable housing, but wary about lost protections.
Concern focuses on environmental safeguards and public-interest conditions tied to the prior deed.
Support would depend on local transparency and guarantees against harm.
Pragmatic support likely if the transfer reduces unnecessary federal encumbrances and includes safeguards.
Wants clear title, limited federal liability, and transparency about intended local uses.
Will look for simple, technical fixes rather than broad policy precedent.
Generally supportive as a restoration of local control and reduction of federal encumbrance.
Views the bill as a small, sensible rollback of unnecessary federal restrictions that can spur private or municipal development.
Minimal federal involvement is preferred.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow, low-cost, administrative land-title removal generally enjoys bipartisan, low-resistance support.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives stress environmental and public-benefit safeguards.
Very narrow, low-cost, administrative land-title removal generally enjoys bipartisan, low-resistance support.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive change that is clearly stated and identifies the parcel and deed at issue. It provides a simple, administrable directive to the Secr…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.