S. 673 (119th)Bill Overview

Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act

Native Americans|Floods and storm protectionFlorida
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 20, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 220.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill amends the Miccosukee Reserved Area Act to add a portion of Everglades National Park known as Osceola Camp to the Miccosukee Reserved Area, using a July 2023 map to define the addition.

It requires the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Tribe, to take appropriate actions within two years to protect structures in the newly added area from flooding.

The map copies must be kept on file with the National Park Service, Miami-Dade County, and the Tribe.

Passage70/100

Narrow, administrative tribal/park matter with modest fiscal ambiguity; typically has good odds absent unexpected stakeholder objections or funding barriers.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention33/100

Progressives emphasize tribal sovereignty and climate adaptation benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesProvides a clear federal designation protecting tribal-occupied land within Everglades National Park.
  • Federal agenciesDirects federal action to reduce flood risk to tribal structures, increasing community resilience.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay spur short-term construction and planning work related to flood protection measures.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersFlood-protection construction could disturb wetlands and sensitive Everglades ecosystems.
  • Federal agenciesThe bill directs actions without an explicit appropriation, potentially creating an unfunded federal obligation.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRequired protective measures might alter natural hydrology, affecting downstream habitats and water management.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize tribal sovereignty and climate adaptation benefits
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive as a measure recognizing tribal space within federal lands and addressing climate-driven flooding risks.

The persona will press for Tribal leadership and ecologically sensitive, nature-based protections that preserve cultural sites.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but cautious.

Supports tribal recognition and flood protection while seeking clarity on costs, environmental review, and coordination with Everglades restoration programs and local authorities.

Leans supportive
Conservative55%

Mixed outlook: sympathetic to protecting tribal structures and local interests but wary of expanding federal obligations, new spending, and altering national park lands.

Prefers spending limits and strict oversight.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Narrow, administrative tribal/park matter with modest fiscal ambiguity; typically has good odds absent unexpected stakeholder objections or funding barriers.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether protective actions require new appropriations
  • Scope and cost of 'appropriate actions' is unspecified
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize tribal sovereignty and climate adaptation benefits

Narrow, administrative tribal/park matter with modest fiscal ambiguity; typically has good odds absent unexpected stakeholder objections or…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis