S. Res. 219 (119th)Bill Overview

A resolution directing the Senate Legal Counsel to bring a civil action in the name of the United States Senate to enforce the Foreign Emoluments Clause contained in clause 8 of section 9 of article I…

Law|Law
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration. (text: CR S2898)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The resolution directs the Senate Legal Counsel to file a civil lawsuit in the name of the United States Senate to enforce the Foreign Emoluments Clause (Art.

I, §9, cl. 8) against President Donald J.

Trump.

Passage25/100

Contentious, targeted action with high partisan salience and legal uncertainty reduces practical prospects despite limited policy complexity.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and focused administrative directive instructing the Senate Legal Counsel to initiate litigation to enforce the Foreign Emoluments Clause. It identifies the responsible entity, the constitutional provision at issue, and the relief sought.

Contention82/100

Progressives emphasize anti-corruption and constitutional enforcement

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTaxpayers
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersSeeks to enforce the Constitution's Foreign Emoluments Clause against alleged foreign payments to the President.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould deter foreign governments from offering payments or gifts to the President without congressional consent.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay restore public confidence by addressing perceived conflicts of interest and foreign influence.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould politicize routine litigation and increase partisan conflict between branches.
  • TaxpayersMay incur significant legal costs for the Senate and taxpayers.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRisk of dismissal on standing or justiciability grounds, rendering litigation ineffective.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize anti-corruption and constitutional enforcement
Progressive95%

Sees the resolution as a necessary constitutional enforcement and anti-corruption step.

Views litigation as an appropriate remedy to protect public trust and prevent undue foreign influence.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Views the resolution as a plausible use of Senate counsel to test constitutional limits, but worries about precedent, costs, and partisan framing.

Wants narrow, evidence-based litigation and institutional safeguards.

Split reaction
Conservative10%

Likely views the resolution as a partisan attack and overreach by the Senate.

Concerns include politicizing constitutional enforcement and encroaching on executive authority.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood25/100

Contentious, targeted action with high partisan salience and legal uncertainty reduces practical prospects despite limited policy complexity.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Senate majority support and internal votes on a politically charged resolution
  • Legal standing and justiciability for Senate-initiated suit
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize anti-corruption and constitutional enforcement

Contentious, targeted action with high partisan salience and legal uncertainty reduces practical prospects despite limited policy complexit…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and focused administrative directive instructing the Senate Legal Counsel to initiate litigation to enforce the Foreign Emoluments Clause. It identifies th…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis