Republicans can fully fund SNAP, but are choosing to only fund it partially.
1 in 8 Americans rely on SNAP.
But Republicans care more about the 1 in 299,560 Americans that are billionaires.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Angela D. Alsobrooks
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 771
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 216 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Thank you Howard County for joining Rep. Elfreth, Attorney General Brown, Comptroller Lierman, and me for our town hall.
Marylanders are sick of this Administration’s cruelty and clear inability to govern. We will continue to fight back and stand strong for Maryland values.
Great to meet with Charles County leadership to hear more on their priorities on how they plan to continue moving the county forward.
I was proud to partner with local leaders and direct federal funding for SMRT and their CSM aviation program.
Reposted bySenator Angela Alsobrooks
It’s a sad day when a judge has to order the President of the United States to feed vulnerable families and hungry children with funds already designated for that very purpose.
Honored to join Pastor Jenkins and other faith leaders for the Master Series of Distinguished Clergy at First Baptist Church of Glenarden.
Together, we will continue the fight for a just future — a future where we can all live safely, with dignity, and thrive.
Happy Halloween Maryland!
I am wishing you all a festive, safe, and fun Halloween – full of treats!
This Administration is illegally withholding available funds for SNAP and WIC.
1 in every 8 Americans relies on SNAP– including nearly 700,000 Marylanders.
The Senate must pass @lujan.senate.gov's bill that would force Trump to release the funding.
I have now put Republicans on record for ignoring the grave security concerns. youtube.com/watch?v=pjgIOibHT-U&feature=youtu.be
My statement on Republicans trying to jam through the Environment and Public Works Committee a partisan resolution, breaking with years of precedent, for the relocation of the FBI headquarters:
Republicans continue to do this President's bidding:
They shut down the government.
They are keeping the government shut down.
And now, they are choosing to deny Americans SNAP.
Inflation is the highest it's been since Trump took office.
Trump’s economy is FAILING. Grocery prices, rent, and health care costs are skyrocketing.
And Republicans would still rather keep our government shut down than lower health care costs.
Federal workers don’t just serve Democrats. They serve every American citizen.
And I would assume and hope everyone in the United States Senate agrees that Americans should get paid for their labor.
If you believe that, I urge you to support our True Shutdown Fairness Act.
Republicans are trying to repurpose our government to serve the billionaires.
My friend Jeff has been on the Senate Floor all night reminding Republicans: this government is for the people NOT the billionaires.
This is really what it comes down to.
I'm holding the Senate floor to say HELL NO to Trump destroying our We the People government.
🔗 www.youtube.com/live/bE37g0m...
This Administration is hoping we get tired. They want us to lose faith, to stand down. They want us to bow down to a king. But we will never bow.
We will keep fighting through this season. And when it is over, we will rebuild. Keep the faith and keep up the fight.
Happy Diwali to all celebrating here in Maryland and across the globe!
May the Festival of Lights bring you and your families peace, happiness, and prosperity.
It was such a joy to speak to the Hillcrest Marlow Heights Civic Association and thank them for all they do for our community.
Their civic engagement has made a difference in so many lives.
Thank you Pastor Gerald Folsom for inviting me to be the guest speaker for Greater Mt. Nebo AME’s “Get Active” Sunday!
In the midst of all we are experiencing, I reminded the congregation that as Christians we must remember to run our spiritual race and keep our eyes on Jesus.
I have a question: Can anyone aside from the billionaires claim their life has gotten because of this presidency? NO.
Have your grocery prices gone down? NO.
Have your health care costs gone down? NO.
This Administration is failing.
Our history is full of evidence that we go through different seasons — seasons of challenge and seasons of progress. Coretta Scott King said that ‘freedom is never really won. You earn it and win it in each generation.’
There are no kings in America — we will fight for that.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History771 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
771 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-02-18 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (72-28) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.