The President has a duty to take seriously the safety and lives of every American military member.
He must remove Pete Hegseth from his position as Secretary of Defense and Mike Waltz from his position as National Security Adviser.
Their security clearances must be permanently revoked.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Angela D. Alsobrooks
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 782
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 222 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Had the messages fallen into the wrong hands — a probable scenario given the lack of security and Waltz’s reckless inclusion of a political reporter — the mission would have failed, and there is a more than likely chance those pilots would be dead.
It is by the grace of God that these pilots are alive today.
It is abundantly clear that the Secretary of Defense and the National Security Adviser put the lives of American pilots in grave danger. In doing so, they have failed in their mandate to protect the lives of our American military members and our national security interests. 🧵
By cutting Maryland's crown jewel - the NIH - Musk and Trump are callously ripping away treatments and cures from Americans suffering from Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, ALS, and other devastating diseases.
They must reverse course now. Lives depend on it.
Tonight we honor all we lost when the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapsed one year ago. Especially the 6 Maryland men who lost their lives.
It’s in their loving memory that we dedicate our own efforts to rebuilding the Key Bridge. youtu.be/1JZgfWE9sCg?...
Wishing all of Maryland a super sweet Maryland Day!
My office is celebrating with the iconic Smith Island Cake, Bergers Cookies, and Otterbein’s Chocolate Chip Cookies (and no matter what, there’s always some Old Bay).🦀
Closing the gender pay gap would add billions to our economy.
Women are paid 75 cents for every $1 paid to a man - that's $14,170/year that could help hardworking families.
Let's pass the Paycheck Fairness Act – and do it now when our economy needs all the help it can get.
I was excited to join Delta for Women in Action for their day of advocacy!
My sorors are fired up and ready to stand up for hardworking families.
No matter what they throw at us, they can never extinguish our torch.
Hold on to your wallets.
This is all by design.
Trump and Musk want your Social Security checks to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.
Joined my sorors at the 36th Annual Delta Days at the Nation's Capital Social Action Luncheon.
The moral arc of the universe may be long, but we - my sorors - are the gravity that bends it toward justice.
We’re here, and we’re not going anywhere.
The ACA has delivered health care for 50 million Americans — including over 600,000 Marylanders.
Quality and affordable health care.
15 years ago today, the President and Congress delivered for hardworking American families. The way it should be.
Honored to meet with so many hardworking Maryland union members at our AFL-CIO Town Hall.
We have had some hard months. And while this Administration has made clear they stand with billionaires. Maryland knows I’m fighting for our workers — and I always will.
Firing public health officials is so dangerous.
I joined my colleagues in demanding that 750 CDC employees - people who keep our nation healthy and safe - be immediately reinstated.
These mass firings are going to cost lives.
www.reuters.com/business/hea...
Thank you Mark Anthony Thomas, President of the Greater Baltimore Committee (GBC) for hosting a conversation about the Baltimore region’s priorities.
I’m looking forward to continue working with the over 400 GBC members partners to keep delivering for the Baltimore region.
Had a meaningful conversation in Baltimore today at the Reginald F. Lewis Museum. I heard directly from local seniors, veterans, health care workers, artists, and parents about the issues impacting them and how I can support them.
Baltimore — I am fighting for you.
I met with the Eastern Shore Association of Municipalities and discussed concerns about frozen federal funds on projects from public safety to affordable housing.
I’m always willing to work with anyone for the benefit of Maryland.
We need to get this critical funding moving.
What a great morning meeting with agricultural leaders on the Eastern Shore. I am grateful to hear their concerns from frozen federal funds to the Avian Flu.
Thank you MD Agriculture Sec. Kevin Atticks! And special thank you to Layton’s Chance Vineyard and Winery for hosting us.
So who’s footing the bill for Republicans’ billionaire tax cut? The nearly 2 million Marylanders on Medicaid.
It’s abhorrent.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History782 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
782 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.