Huge thank you to these Wisconsinites in Racine and everyone who has come out so far to share their stories with me about how Medicaid is a lifeline for them. We are in this fight together.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin
Tammy Baldwin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes30%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 43 sponsored · 268 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Kicking off Day #3 of my Hands Off Medicaid Tour in Racine! 📍
Wisconsinites across the state are fired up about Elon Musk and Republicans working to take their health care away and we are not letting up.
My constituents are angry at Elon Musk’s and Republicans’ plan to rip away health care from their loved ones on Medicaid — all so they can pay for new tax breaks for billionaires. I hear them loud and clear, and I am fighting with them. themonroetimes.com/local-news/b...
I’ve been on the road, traveling the state to hear directly from Wisconsinites on Medicaid who stand to lose their health care because of Elon Musk and Republicans’ plan to cut this critical program. I’m not taking my foot off the gas.
Over one million Wisconsinites rely on Medicaid, but they are not just statistics. I’m in Eau Claire with the real people who rely on Medicaid to stay healthy.
I’m not going to let Republicans fund their tax break for the rich on the backs of these folks. #MedicaidDayofAction
In Eau Claire today for Day #2 of my Hands Off Medicaid Tour. 📍
I’ll be talking with Wisconsin families who are standing up against Republican efforts to terminate the health care that keeps them and their families well.
Medicaid is a lifeline for Wisconsinites like the ones here in La Crosse. While Republicans work hard to rip away care from grandparents and kids to fund new tax breaks for billionaires, we have one message for them: Hands off Medicaid.
Today, I am launching my Hands Off Medicaid Tour. Republicans' plan will cut Medicaid to the bone and crush Wisconsinites.
I am hitting the road to talk with Wisconsinites and fight back.
First stop: La Crosse.📍
I will not sit idly by while the richest man in the world takes away the benefits seniors have earned over a lifetime of hard work. You can bet I will fight to protect your social security.
www.nytimes.com/2025/03/14/u...
Elon Musk’s and President Trump’s mass firings are a big slap in the face to the people who have worked hard to serve our country.
www.wpr.org/news/federal...
Wisconsin farmers and producers work tirelessly to grow food that feeds hungry children and stocks our local food pantries.
Now, Elon Musk and President Trump are slashing that program and leaving our farmers out to dry and some kids without food.
www.wpr.org/news/usda-cu...
The richest man in the world called Social Security a Ponzi scheme. Now, he's pushing to take away our seniors' benefits that they have EARNED through a lifetime of hard work.
Donald Trump and Elon Musk are firing the workers who ensure Pell Grants, student loans, and federal funding for our schools get out the door all so they can give tax breaks to big corporations.
This isn’t efficiency—this will hurt Wisconsin kids.
www.newsweek.com/doe-educatio...
President Trump promised lower costs. Instead, he can’t rule out a recession.
This is not what Americans want. abcnews.go.com/Business/sto...
Wisconsin farmers work hard on tight margins to make world-class products. While Donald Trump and Elon Musk work to claw back the funding our farmers were promised, I’ll continue to stand up for Wisconsin’s dairy businesses.
urbanmilwaukee.com/pressrelease...
Republicans are making veterans’ lives harder so they can make billionaires richer.
www.cnn.com/2025/03/06/p...
Republicans are downplaying what kicking people off Medicaid would mean for the health and well-being of millions of Americans. That’s why I wanted them to meet Renee.
This is an attack on Wisconsinites’ Social Security. Plain and simple. Not only will this result in longer wait times and service delays, but this will impact seniors in our rural communities the hardest. www.wsaw.com/2025/02/28/s...
President Trump and Republicans are trading children’s education for billionaire tax breaks.
Abolishing the Department of Education would be devastating for parents, teachers, and schools.
I will fight back in every way I can.
www.npr.org/2025/03/05/n...
“I want to live. I want to be healthy. I want to have my health care.” — Renee, a Wisconsinite who relies on Medicaid to live.
President Trump is refusing to own up to his plan to cut Medicaid and didn’t even utter the word “Medicaid” last night. www.weau.com/2025/03/05/b...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.