Tammy Baldwin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Wisconsin
Born
February 11, 1962
Age 64
Phone
(202) 224-5653
Office
141 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin

Tammy Baldwin

Tammy Suzanne Green Baldwin is an American politician and lawyer serving since 2013 as the junior United States senator from Wisconsin. A member of the Democratic Party, she has also served as the secretary of the Senate Democratic Caucus since 2017. Baldwin has been the dean of the United States congressional delegation from Wisconsin since 2023, when Representative Ron Kind retired.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 782
Yes30%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tammy Baldwin headshot
Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 43 sponsored · 264 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Donald Trump's war of choice has left our farmers paying the price. Today, I was in Mt. Horeb to talk with farmers about how the illegal war in Iran is driving up fertilizer and fuel prices. This war needs to end, now.
If you want to watch all of the Packers, Bucks, and Brewers games – these are all of the subscriptions you need. The web of streaming services is just not working for fans. I have a bill to fix it.
Watching sports has become confusing and just downright expensive. It shouldn't take paying $1,500/year and 10 different streaming services to watch the teams you love. I have a bill to cut costs, end black outs, and guarantee local fans can watch their teams for free.
No expecting mother should have to worry about finding quality care. As we enter Black Maternal Health Week, we must address the gaps in care facing women of color. I've introduced the Perinatal Workforce Act to close this gap, so every mother receives the support she deserves.
Donald Trump promised to cut costs and keep America out of foreign wars. Not only has he dragged us into an illegal war of choice—he’s causing prices to skyrocket and inflation to soar.
Our veterans have earned timely, high-quality care at the VA – but the Trump Administration is threatening that. Our veterans need some answers from this Administration, and I’m pushing for them.
Mail delays are making it harder for Wisconsinites to stay in touch with loved ones, pay their bills, receive medications, and cast their votes. USPS needs to find a solution, and fast.
The health care system in America has been broken for a while, but after this administration’s massive health care cuts, this is where American families are at right now. It doesn’t have to be this way.
Diplomacy has always been the answer, which is why the President shouldn’t have gotten us into this war of choice. It’s been reckless, cost U.S. soldiers their lives, and is raising prices on families. A ceasefire is a start, but Congress needs to do our jobs and end this war.
This would be a war crime, plain and simple. Killing innocent people is not only cruel and immoral, but it’s just not what Wisconsinites want. President Trump needs to end his war of choice. Now.
I’ve seen enough of large corporate investors buying up single-family homes in Wisconsin and making them unavailable for our families. We have to make homeownership more attainable for folks, and this bill is a start. www.wjfw.com/news/local/s...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
782 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16