Families are scraping by to afford their lifesaving medications while big drug companies are raking in billions of dollars in profits. I’ve been fighting to bring down costs for families and my bill would do that by capping the price of prescription drugs.
www.weau.com/2025/02/14/s...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin
Tammy Baldwin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes30%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 43 sponsored · 268 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
#HappyPresidentsDay.
I’m all for making our government more efficient but firing nurses and pharmacists who keep families healthy, disease experts who protect us from the next pandemic, and scientists finding cures for cancer is not efficient — it’s dangerous. apnews.com/article/trum...
We weren’t kidding when we said they were coming after the Affordable Care Act.
Here is step one of how they’ll rip away health care from your family. ⬇️
www.axios.com/2025/02/14/t...
We cannot and will not stand by while an unelected billionaire dismantles the Department of Education from the inside out and cuts funding for our schools.
www.cnbc.com/2025/02/13/w...
Child care. Firefighters. Cops. Entire communities are still figuring out if this Administration is going to illegally cut their funding.
We are fighting to make sure the President doesn’t take it from you.
Roses are red. ❤️
Violets are blue. 💙
Republicans are taking your health care from you! 💔
The Trump administration has cut funding for community-based navigators who help people sign up for the ACA from $98 million to $10 million.
The first Trump administration also cut navigators, with funding restored by the Biden administration.
www.cms.gov/newsroom/pre...
Donald Trump and Elon Musk have made it clear as day.
They need to find room in the budget to give big corporations and their billionaire friends a tax break.
And the American people are going to pay for it.
Americans deserve someone who follows the science – not conspiracy theories – when it comes to keeping our families safe and healthy.
RFK, Jr. is not that person.
If President Trump thinks he can just ignore Congress and fund the programs he likes, does that mean he can just cut off Medicare in the Blue States? What about just funding the VA in Red States?
This is not a Kingdom, there are three branches of government in this country.
Thank you all for the kind birthday wishes today! I’ll be celebrating by joining @lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.com on the Last Word tonight. Be sure to tune in! 📺
Cutting the research to find cures for cancer and Alzheimer’s so they can cut taxes for billionaires. That’s their plan.
You can bet I’m fighting back. madison.com/news/local/e...
I’ve spoken with Shanon and William directly, and their son Cole should still be with them.
My heart still breaks for them but look, this should never happen. That’s why I’ve been fighting to hold major drug companies' feet to the fire and lower the cost of inhalers.
Cutting funding for cancer research won’t help families, it will hurt them and the progress we’ve made to find lifesaving cures. Make no mistake, slashing this critical funding will mean people won’t get the treatments they need and workers will lose their jobs.
Wall Street investors should not be paying LESS in taxes than Wisconsin firefighters, teachers, and small business owners. It’s as simple as that.
My bill would close this tax loophole and ensure the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share. civicmedia.us/news/2025/02...
Illegally cutting funding that families rely on for finding cures for diseases like cancer, Alzheimer's, and diabetes will have dire consequences. It means less hope for ending diseases that plague every family. People will likely be fired. This is wrong and we are fighting back.
Look, I have a very hard time believing the richest man in the world is fighting for hard-working Wisconsinites, not himself and his billionaire friends. He has no business accessing Americans' social security information.
www.semafor.com/article/02/0...
Lastly, I’ll never shy away from standing up for our workers & our Made in Wisconsin economy. I will stand up to big corporations who don’t respect their employees, China when they undermine our businesses, & any President who doesn’t work with me to keep things here in the U.S. #MadeInUSA. 🇺🇲 (7/7)
Your reproductive rights have been under attack, and I won’t stand for it. Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, I’ve been fighting to restore a woman’s right to control her own body, health care, and future. And I won’t stop until we do just that. (6/7)
I’m on a mission to lower costs for families and put child care within reach for more Wisconsinites so that even my smallest constituents can get the education they deserve. (5/7)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.