This is a big win for these nurses and every patient who walks through the door at Meriter. Every worker deserves dignity and respect on the job — including a safe work environment and a fair paycheck. I’m proud these nurses fought for that and won!
www.wkow.com/community/me...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin
Tammy Baldwin
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes31%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 52 sponsored · 321 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
A house is more than just a place to live. It provides security and stability. That’s why I’m fighting to ensure more Wisconsinites can afford to live in the communities they love. Great to be in Washburn breaking ground on new affordable housing that I secured funding for!
Today, I was in Superior meeting with families who rely on Medicaid. Republicans want to take that lifeline away from tens of thousands of Wisconsinites.
When I travel Wisconsin, I hear about the dire need for more affordable child care. This week, I was in Rice Lake and Eau Claire to talk with Wisconsin Head Starts about what President Trump’s threats to the program mean for working families.
Farmers are on the front lines of Donald Trump’s reckless trade war. Today, I was in Chippewa Falls to hear directly from Wisconsin farmers who are facing growing uncertainty as costs go up and export markets shrink.
Donald Trump came into office promising to lower costs for families. Instead, Republicans are about to jack up the cost of health care for hundreds of thousands of Wisconsinites, all so the wealthiest Americans can get richer.
Today, I was in Madison hearing from Wisconsin veterans about what’s at stake if the Trump administration makes good on their promise to fire 83,000 VA employees.
Yesterday, I was honored to join the American Legion in Fond du Lac to visit with our veterans on Memorial Day and honor those who lost their lives for our freedom. Thank you for the warm reception and your service to our country.
Head Start works. It is a vital lifeline for affordable child care and early childhood education that we should be working to expand, not defund. It was great to be in Racine today to hear about what Head Start means to these Wisconsin families.
I met with families and providers at Head Start in Waukesha today. They told me about the chaos of having to shut their doors, leaving hundreds of families and children without care because of the Trump administration's reckless actions. I’m in this fight with them.
If you’re going to take away funding for diabetes, cancer, and HIV research, at least have the courage to tell the American people.
RFK, Jr. can’t even do that.
www.notus.org/health-scien...
In the middle of the night, Republicans jammed through a bill that terminates healthcare for more than 220,000 Wisconsinites, slashes funding for food assistance, and tilts the scales of our already unfair tax system more in favor of big corporations.
We’re fighting this thing.
As middle-class families live paycheck to paycheck, wealthy Wall Street insiders continue to get tax breaks. It’s past time to get rid of this unfair loophole.
President Trump claims to be on board, so let’s get it done! www.wausaudailyherald.com/story/news/n...
Republicans’ bill will kick millions of Americans off Medicaid.
Republicans’ bill will jack up costs on groceries for Americans.
Republicans’ bill will give tax breaks to the wealthiest people in America.
This is not what Wisconsinites want.
Milwaukee called Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s agency for help to get rid of lead in schools that could be poisoning kids.
They were told everyone who could help them was fired.
Wisconsinites deserve better. www.tmj4.com/news/milwauk...
Testimony after testimony, Wisconsinites are speaking out and sharing their stories about how Medicaid has been a lifeline for them. They are the reason I’ll never stop fighting to protect access to affordable health care.
Huge thank you to all the Wisconsin police officers who serve and protect our communities across the Badger State! 💙 #NationalPoliceWeek
There’s nothing “efficient” about Elon Musk’s DOGE creating havoc and uncertainty for our veterans. www.news8000.com/sen-tammy-ba...
First, I listen. Then, I act.
I heard directly from these Veterans in La Crosse who have one message: don’t mess with the VA and take away their care.
I will stand up to anyone, including Donald Trump and Elon Musk, to uphold our promise to these vets.
www.wxow.com/news/senator...
Republicans claimed that they’re not cutting Medicaid. Well, they finally unveiled their plan in writing to kick MILLIONS of Americans off their health care.
I’ll fight this all I can to make sure Republicans keep their hands off Medicaid!
abcnews.go.com/Politics/wir...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (73-25) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-31) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-30) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (63-32) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-33) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (54-46) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (27-73) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (84-16) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.