Working families do not want their hard-earned tax dollars paying for a luxury ballroom or a slush fund for criminals who beat up cops, but President Trump is hellbent on squeezing every last penny out of them.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin
Tammy Baldwin
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 885
Yes31%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 52 sponsored · 320 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Our local airports are vital hubs for our Wisconsin economy. They need to be ready to handle increased traffic and keep travelers safe. I’m glad to support these investments so our airports can keep growing and serving our communities.
Americans don’t want to pay $5 for a gallon of gas.
Americans don’t want to pay a billion dollars for a luxury ballroom.
Americans don’t want to pay billions for a slush fund for January 6 rioter payouts.
But that’s what this president is trying to force them to do.
Workers need to be at the center of any trade deal the U.S. makes. For too long, jobs have been shipped offshore & China has been cheating. Enough is enough. The President needs to stand up for the people who make our economy & country go round: workers. www.cnbc.com/2026/05/20/c...
Trump is setting up a $1.8 billion slush fund for payouts to his political friends who have committed crimes.
Who’s eligible to get a payout? January 6 insurrectionists, Trump family members, Trump allies, etc.
Who’s paying for it? YOU, the taxpayer.
Finally, after weeks of pleading with our Republican colleagues to listen to their constituents and do their constitutional duty, we earned the support we need to rein in this reckless war. It’s overdue, but this is the first step toward stopping this illegal war that’s raising everyone’s costs.
Our troops asked for more medical supplies, but the Army ignored them. Then, an Iranian missile hit them, killing 6 servicemembers and injuring more. These troops said those supplies could have saved lives. We need answers from this administration.
www.cbsnews.com/news/troops-...
Here’s an idea: instead of spending taxpayer money on Trump’s ballroom, we spend that money making working families' lives more affordable.
Millions of Packers fans in Wisconsin will be forced to pay for Netflix just to watch our home team play.
So yes, I do take issue with this deal.
www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootb...
We need to make housing more affordable for folks. I’m proud to be working to bring down costs and help more Wisconsinites live and invest in the communities they love. www.wsaw.com/video/2026/0...
I care. That’s why I’ve been fighting to end Trump’s war in Iran that’s been jacking up everyone’s costs.
The cost of just about everything is rising. The last thing Wisconsinites need is the NFL making them spend their hard-earned money on another costly streaming service just to watch our Packers play.
www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootb...
President Trump’s war of choice in Iran has sent the cost of fertilizer and gas through the roof for our farmers. That is not just theoretical for farmers in Wisconsin, and today, I toured Skenandore Farm in Seymour to hear just what it means for them.
Good. This never should have been up for debate. Women in America, regardless of where they live, should have the freedom to control their bodies without any politicians or judges getting in the way.
www.nbcnews.com/politics/sup...
The health care fight is personal for me. I battled a childhood illness and was denied coverage – at any cost – because of my “pre-existing condition.”
This is a step in the wrong direction – we can and must do better for working families.
www.notus.org/healthcare/a...
Trump wants hardworking Wisconsinites to help pay $1 billion for his glamorous ballroom. Here’s a list of the things we could be investing in instead.
Wisconsin farmers were already feeling squeezed by Trump's trade war, now they are facing skyrocketing costs from Trump's war of choice in Iran.
Farmers just want a fair shot to succeed. This war must end now.
I wish President Trump spent this much time and energy trying to lower Americans’ costs instead of wasting more money on yet another vanity project in D.C.
At the same time folks are going hungry because of President Trump’s cuts to food stamps, he wants our families to spend $1 billion on his luxury ballroom.
When it comes to shipbuilding, China has been cheating left and right – and American jobs, businesses and security are paying the price.
Proud to lead a group of Republicans and Democrats to call on Trump to stand up for America when he sees President Xi this week.
www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History885 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
885 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
| 2026-07-28 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-07-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2026-07-23 | S.J. Res. 180 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-44) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-36) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2026-07-21 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-48) |
| 2026-07-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (43-40) |
| 2026-07-16 | S.J. Res. 198 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-50) |
| 2026-07-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-14 | S. 4784 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2026-07-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (46-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 185 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 196 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-23 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2026-06-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-30) |
| 2026-06-22 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (85-5) |
| 2026-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-39) |
| 2026-06-18 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-17 | S. Res. 616 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-39) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 18Next →