When Zelenskyy visits Monday, Trump must commit to sales of vital arms for transfer to Ukraine. And scorching sanctions—an economic sledgehammer—in our Graham-Blumenthal bill.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Connecticut
Richard Blumenthal
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes27%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Richard Blumenthal
U.S. SenatorDemocratConnecticut
SoupScore
Richard's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 102 sponsored · 564 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
A potentially historic turning point—showing strength supporting Ukraine is key to peace, after Putin’s optics triumph & Trump’s weak retreat. Bromantic coddling, reversing his ceasefire insistence (& more) only embolden Putin—a KGB thug who understands only force. time.com/7310116/trum...
An amazing win by true champions. All CT is cheering for Fairfield National! You’re making us all proud!
www.courant.com/2025/08/15/f...
The Trump Admin’s cruel, senseless cuts to the federal workforce hamper the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality’s ability to carry out essential work that improves care quality, saves the government billions annually, & most importantly, saves lives. www.statnews.com/2025/08/13/f...
Medical debt will be a burgeoning burden as cuts in healthcare coverage kick in. Saving people from big black marks on their credit report is why I’m helping lead the Medical Debt Relief Act.
Norwalk’s National Night Out event drew great crowds—a strong showing of community & public service.
Posting violent threats after a deadly shooting should be disqualifying to serve in any position of public trust. I'm calling on Sec. Kennedy to fire Robert Malone from ACIP & to restore all 17 members who he wrongfully terminated in June thehill.com/policy/healt...
Inspiring visit to Family Centers FQHC in Stamford—a health center expanding to meet community health care needs. Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers are in fact critical to adequate medical services in CT. Federal cuts in support are deeply dangerous & damaging.
Hate crimes are abhorrent, but strong action can deter them. Thank you to Stamford police for prompt enforcement. Crimes involving Islamophobia or any other religious or ethnic bias should have zero tolerance. www.greenwichtime.com/news/article...
Delay & play Trump—always Putin’s strategy. Trump should make clear he sees through it, especially after his European conference today. A ceasefire looks like surrender if it’s on Putin’s terms. Particularly without Ukraine even in the room. www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
Trump tirelessly exploits power for personal profit—including crypto—the public interest be damned. He’s grifter-in-chief, in an Administration filled with them. theintercept.com/2025/08/09/t...
CT Transit celebrating 50 years of service— thanks to hardworking, dedicated drivers, mechanics, schedulers, & more. CT appreciates you.
Our country is facing a burgeoning housing crisis, & we must take action now to combat it. The American Housing & Economic Mobility Act will help people find a safe, secure, & affordable place to live.
Trump blinks—again. Just as he ducked his Russia deadline on Friday, he’s delaying any sanctions reckoning for China. A reprieve & retreat for Russia’s largest oil & gas customer. A message of supreme weakness going into this week’s Putin summit. www.washingtonpost.com/business/202...
CT consumers are paying too much for electricity—with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission totally failing to protect them against rising transmission costs. I’m demanding FERC—a paper tiger—do its job.
New Haven’s amazing Puerto Rican Festival had everything—huge joyful crowds, roaring music, delicious food, & absolutely perfect weather. Thanks to my teammate Joe Rodriguez for his leadership, & all the dedicated volunteers who made it a tremendous success.
An awe-inspiring visit with Michelle Nicholson, owner of The Flour Girl Bakery & Cafe & SBA/CT Small Business Person of the Year. Congratulations on this well-deserved achievement honoring your vision, craftsmanship, & community impact.
Local policing is a local responsibility— federal intervention only a last resort. No need in D.C.
Reeking of vengeance & vanity, Trump’s local policing takeover seems totally unnecessary & likely unlawful. It’s also a deeply frightening precedent for other cities, where his personal whims & ambitions may lead to more military deployments. www.nytimes.com/live/2025/08...
Proud to join environmental leaders to honor Lynn Werner with the 2025 Conservation Hero Award from the CT Land Conservation Council. She’s been a fearless, fierce advocate as leader of the Housatonic Valley Association. And so effective in protecting CT natural treasures.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (54-46) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (27-73) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (84-16) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.